Current eye research · 2018
Therapeutic Effect of Intense Pulsed Light on Ocular Demodicosis.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang XiaoZhao, Song Nan, Gong Lan
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of Lumenis® M22TM intense pulsed light (IPL) in reduction of ocular Demodex infestation in eyelashes in a prospective study.
METHODS: Forty patients with ocular demodicosis were recruited. Then half were randomly picked to receive the IPL treatment, while the other half got 5% tea tree oil (as the control group). Demodex counts, the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, lid margin abnormalities, conjunctival congestion, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal staining with fluorescein, meibomian gland (MG) expressibility, meibum quality, modified Schirmer I test with anaesthetic (SIT), were assessed on the day before treatment and after treatment of 30 and 90 days, respectively. Changes in the parameters were compared between the IPL group and the control group on the days after treatment of 30 and 90 days.
RESULTS: No differences were observed in Demodex counts, lid margin abnormalities, conjunctival congestion, corneal staining with fluorescein, MG expressibility, SIT in the two groups on the days after treatment of 30 and 90 days (p > 0.05), whereas there was a statistically significant difference in the OSDI score, TBUT, meibum quality (p < 0.05). The Demodex eradication rate was more thorough in the IPL group (100%) than in the control group (75%).
CONCLUSIONS: IPL shows the preferably therapeutic potential for ocular Demodicosis.
METHODS: Forty patients with ocular demodicosis were recruited. Then half were randomly picked to receive the IPL treatment, while the other half got 5% tea tree oil (as the control group). Demodex counts, the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score, lid margin abnormalities, conjunctival congestion, tear break-up time (TBUT), corneal staining with fluorescein, meibomian gland (MG) expressibility, meibum quality, modified Schirmer I test with anaesthetic (SIT), were assessed on the day before treatment and after treatment of 30 and 90 days, respectively. Changes in the parameters were compared between the IPL group and the control group on the days after treatment of 30 and 90 days.
RESULTS: No differences were observed in Demodex counts, lid margin abnormalities, conjunctival congestion, corneal staining with fluorescein, MG expressibility, SIT in the two groups on the days after treatment of 30 and 90 days (p > 0.05), whereas there was a statistically significant difference in the OSDI score, TBUT, meibum quality (p < 0.05). The Demodex eradication rate was more thorough in the IPL group (100%) than in the control group (75%).
CONCLUSIONS: IPL shows the preferably therapeutic potential for ocular Demodicosis.