Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation in failed stentless valves: a single-center experience.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) offers an alternative to repeat cardiac surgery in selected patients. However, ViV-TAVI in previously implanted stentless valves is more challenging than in a stented valve. This single-center study aimed to analyze the outcomes of ViV-TAVI in stentless valves.
METHODS
Data were retrospectively collected from 1476 patients undergoing TAVI between January 2018 and December 2023. The primary study endpoint was 30-day and follow-up mortality. Secondary outcomes included Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 technical success, VARC-3 device success, and VARC-3 early safety.
RESULTS
A total of 15 patients underwent ViV-TAVI within previously implanted stentless valves. The mean age of the patients was 78.1 ± 9.3 years, with a median STS-PROM score of 4.30 (3.05, 6.75). The mean time between SAVR and TAVI was 14.7 ± 3.9 years. Eight (53.3%) patients presented with severe aortic regurgitation, while 5 (33.3%) patients had severe aortic stenosis. There were no surgical conversions, but a single case of transcatheter heart valve malposition required the deployment of a second valve. One patient died within 30 days. VARC-3 technical success was achieved in 87.6% (n = 13) of patients, device success in 80% (n = 12), and early safety in 73.3% (n = 11). The median follow-up period was 2.9 (range, 1.3-4.3) years, during which 4 patients died.
CONCLUSIONS
Careful patient selection is critical for ViV-TAVI procedures because of the high risk of complications, which is increased with stentless valves in addition to the standard risks associated with the ViV procedure. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.