DOI 10.1016/j.amjoto.2026.104786
Can microbial profiles influence type II inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps?
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to assess how different treatments - dupilumab vs surgery - influence the nasal microbiota, type 2 inflammation, and clinical outcomes in CRSwNP patients.
METHODS
This was a prospective observational study of 44 CRSwNP patients assigned to 6 months of biweekly dupilumab injections or functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). Nasal microbiotas were analyzed at baseline and 6 months using culture techniques. Inflammatory biomarkers (IgE, eosinophils) and clinical endpoints (polyp score, SNOT-22, smell test) were measured. Patients were also stratified into groups based on which bacteria were cultured from their sinuses.
RESULTS
At baseline, the most prevalent bacteria were Staphylococcus aureus (43%), Stapylococcus epidermidis (36%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (16%). After 6 months, S. aureus and S. epidermidis significantly increased while P. aeruginosa decreased. Eosinophil counts were stable. IgE levels notably decreased in the S. aureus and S. epidermidis groups but increased with P. aeruginosa. All bacterial groups showed reduced polyp score and SNOT-22, and improved smell, but P. aeruginosa had smaller gains. Higher baseline S. aureus and S. epidermidis correlated with more significant IgE decrease.
CONCLUSIONS
Dupilumab and surgery-induced favourable microbiota changes by reducing pathogenic bacteria. Nasal microbiota composition may be associated inflammatory and clinical treatment responses in CRSwNP. S. aureus and S. epidermidis correlated with a greater improvement of IgE levels, whereas P. aeruginosa correlated with worse IgE outcomes. Analyzing each patient's nasal microbiome could enable more personalized, microbiome-directed treatment approaches for optimal CRSwNP management.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.