Mini-Invasive Neurosurgical Treatment of Subdural Empyema: A Two-Patient Case Series.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Subdural empyema is a neurosurgical emergency traditionally managed with craniotomy and prolonged intravenous antibiotic therapy. Minimally invasive approaches may represent an alternative in selected cases, particularly when combined with timely diagnosis and targeted antimicrobial treatment.
PATIENTS: We report two cases of subdural empyema treated with minimally invasive burr-hole evacuation.
CASE 1: A 22-year-old man with developmental anomalies and postischemic stroke history presented with intermittent high fever for 2 weeks. Rapid neurological deterioration over 24 hours led to coma (Glasgow Coma Scale 5). Cranial computed tomography (CT) revealed a right-sided subdural empyema with significant mass effect. Emergency burr-hole evacuation was performed, followed by broad-spectrum antibiotics later tailored to Staphylococcus aureus.
CASE 2: A 40-year-old man presented with hypertensive intracranial syndrome and febrile episodes for 1 week. CT and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a left hemispheric subdural collection suggestive of empyema, likely secondary to otitis media from suspected Streptococcus anginosus. Burr-hole evacuation and empiric triple antibiotic therapy were initiated.
RESULTS
In both cases, postoperative imaging confirmed complete evacuation without residual collection. The first patient required prolonged intensive care with gradual neurological improvement over several weeks, whereas the second patient achieved immediate postoperative recovery. At 2-year radiological follow-up, no recurrence was observed in either patient.
CONCLUSION
Minimally invasive burr-hole evacuation, combined with culture-guided antibiotic therapy, can be effective in selected cases of subdural empyema, yielding favorable clinical and radiological outcomes.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.