Nitinol flexigrip sternal closure system and standard sternal steel wiring: insight from a matched comparative analysis.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to assess the efficiency of two different sternal closure techniques in preventing sternal wound instability in high-risk patients.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Between January 2009 and February 2012, 2068 consecutive cardiac patients were prospectively collected in our database. The 561 patients in whom the thermoreactive nitilium clips (Flexigrip) have been used (group A) were matched 1 : 1 with 561 patients who received a standard parasternal wiring technique (group B) on 10 available risk factors known to affect sternal wound healing (age, age >75 years, sex, diabetes mellitus, cardiac procedure, obesity, re-intervention, cross-clamp, and total operative times). The study was completed with a cost analysis.

RESULTS

The two groups were well matched, although different for bilateral internal thoracic harvesting, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal insufficiency, and congestive heart failure, which were significantly more frequent in group A. At 30 days of follow-up, the association of wound complication and sternal instability was significantly less frequent in group A versus group B (0.2 versus 1.6%) (P = 0.04). Overall incidence of sternal wound complication was lower in group A (2 versus 3.5%) (P = 0.28). In the presence of wound infection, a sternal wound instability was never observed in group A (P = 0.06). Overall costs were €8,701,854 and €9,243,702 in groups A and B, respectively; thus the Flexigrip closure technique offered a €541,848 cost saving.

CONCLUSIONS

Flexigrip use in high-risk patients showed a lower incidence of sternal wound instability with no need for sternal re-wiring in any case, even in the presence of wound infection.