MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/acn3.70235

Медицинская библиотека · Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2025

Lessons Learned: Quality Analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography in Neuromyelitis Optica.

Salih Hadi, Samadzadeh Sara, Bereuter Charlotte, Motamedi Seyedamirhosein, Chien Claudia, Villoslada Pablo, Stiebel-Kalish Hadas, Asgari Nasrin, Mao-Draayer Yang, Ringelstein Marius, Havla Joachim, Peixoto Marco Aurélio Lana, Kim Ho Jin, Palace Jacqueline, Leite Maria Isabel, Sharma Srilakshmi M, Ashtari Fereshteh, Kafieh Rahele, Pandit Lekha, Aktas Orhan, Albrecht Philipp, Leocani Letizia, Lotan Itay, Siritho Sasitorn, de Seze Jérôme, Marignier Romain, Tilikete Caroline Froment, Bichuetti Denis Bernardi, Tavares Ivan Maynart, Altintas Ayse, Jacob Anu, Huda Saif, de Castillo Ibis Soto, Cook Lawrence J, Yeaman Michael R, Petzold Axel, Brandt Alexander U, Paul Friedemann, Oertel Frederike C, Zimmermann Hanna G, with the Guthy Jackson Charitable Foundation—International Clinical Consortium and CROCTINO Collaborators

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Optical coherence tomography (OCT)-derived retina measurements are markers for neuroaxonal visual pathway status. High-quality OCT scans are essential for reliable measurements, but their acquisition is particularly challenging in eyes with severe visual impairment, as often observed in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate OCT quality issues in real-world data from the international Collaborative Retrospective Study on Retinal OCT in Neuromyelitis Optica (CROCTINO).

METHODS

We evaluated the quality of peripapillary and macular OCT scans, using Heidelberg Spectralis SD-OCT, Carl Zeiss Cirrus HD-OCT, or Topcon SD-OCT across 22 centers. Experienced graders applied OSCAR-IB criteria for OCT quality. Eyes were classified as severely visually impaired or not based on a 1.0 logMAR cut-off. Quality outcomes were compared using the Chi-square test.

RESULTS

A total of 3075 OCT scans (1630 peripapillary, 1445 macular) from 539 people with NMOSD and related conditions were evaluated. Macular scans were rejected more often than peripapillary scans due to quality issues (20.1% vs. 14.5%, p < 0.001). Rejection rates were higher in eyes with severe visual impairment (peripapillary: 28.9%, macular: 41.6%) compared to eyes without severe visual impairment (peripapillary: 10.7%, p < 0.001; macular: 14.6%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed that approximately one in six scans was rejected due to low quality, with higher rejection rates in eyes with severe visual impairment. As scan quality can bias quantitative outcomes and artificial intelligence applications, these findings emphasize the unmet need for standardized OCT practices tailored to NMOSD and other conditions involving severe visual impairment.

Для цитирования: Salih Hadi, Samadzadeh Sara, Bereuter Charlotte, Motamedi Seyedamirhosein, Chien Claudia, Villoslada Pablo, Stiebel-Kalish Hadas, Asgari Nasrin, Mao-Draayer Yang, Ringelstein Marius, Havla Joachim, Peixoto Marco Aurélio Lana, Kim Ho Jin, Palace Jacqueline, Leite Maria Isabel, Sharma Srilakshmi M, Ashtari Fereshteh, Kafieh Rahele, Pandit Lekha, Aktas Orhan, Albrecht Philipp, Leocani Letizia, Lotan Itay, Siritho Sasitorn, de Seze Jérôme, Marignier Romain, Tilikete Caroline Froment, Bichuetti Denis Bernardi, Tavares Ivan Maynart, Altintas Ayse, Jacob Anu, Huda Saif, de Castillo Ibis Soto, Cook Lawrence J, Yeaman Michael R, Petzold Axel, Brandt Alexander U, Paul Friedemann, Oertel Frederike C, Zimmermann Hanna G, with the Guthy Jackson Charitable Foundation—International Clinical Consortium and CROCTINO Collaborators. Lessons Learned: Quality Analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography in Neuromyelitis Optica.. Annals of clinical and translational neurology. 2025. DOI: 10.1002/acn3.70235.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.