MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/ehjcr/ytad165

Медицинская библиотека · European heart journal. Case reports · 2023

Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion following successful treatment of large bi-atrial thrombi in a patient with atrial fibrillation: a case report.

Ng Kim Fong, Calvert Peter, Khalatbari Afshin, Lip Gregory Y H, Velavan Periaswamy, Gupta Dhiraj

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a well-established risk factor for intracardiac thrombosis. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is emerging as a viable alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) for high-risk AF patients who are contraindicated to long-term OAC.

CASE SUMMARY: A 74-year-old man with a history of permanent AF and subdural haemorrhage on warfarin therapy was referred to our facility for further management. Cardiac CT imaging revealed large bi-atrial thrombi for which apixaban therapy was initiated. Serial imaging over nine months showed gradual shrinkage and then resolution of the thrombi. In line with the patient's preference to avoid life-long OAC, he received LAAO using an Amplatzer™ Amulet™ device. Follow-up transoesophageal echocardiography showed a well-seated device with no leak and no thrombus.

DISCUSSION: We discussed the key issues surrounding management of bi-atrial thrombi and the decision to perform LAAO in these circumstances, relying on shared decision making and multi-disciplinary team input.

Для цитирования: Ng Kim Fong, Calvert Peter, Khalatbari Afshin, Lip Gregory Y H, Velavan Periaswamy, Gupta Dhiraj. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion following successful treatment of large bi-atrial thrombi in a patient with atrial fibrillation: a case report.. European heart journal. Case reports. 2023. DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytad165.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.