BMJ open quality · 2026
Assessing patient and client safety culture across integrated health and social care services: a cross-sectional study in Finland.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hult Marja, Pekonen Arja, Koskinen Sanna, Lojander Jaana, Varpula Jaakko, Kangasniemi Mari
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Patient safety culture is a critical component of healthcare quality, influencing both staff behaviour and patient outcomes. While it has been widely studied in hospital settings, less is known about its variation across integrated health and social care systems.
OBJECTIVE: To examine patient and client safety culture within a well-being services county in Finland from the perspective of employees.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Finnish version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (SOPS 2.0) and the Net Safety Score (NSS). The sample included 2623 staff members from hospital, social and health and elderly services. Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, Pearson correlations and linear regressions were used to analyse differences and associations.
RESULTS: Among the SOPS dimensions, teamwork received the highest positive ratings (71.1%), whereas handoffs and information exchange scored the lowest (22.6%). Significant differences were observed across service areas, with elderly services consistently reporting lower scores. All safety culture dimensions were significantly correlated with the NSS. Regression analysis identified teamwork, staffing and work pace and organisational learning as the strongest significant predictors of the NSS in all the service areas. The overall proportion of positive responses for NSS was 52.6%. The model explained 47.4% of the variance in NSS in hospital services, 47.0% in elderly services and 35.8% in social and health services.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient and client safety culture varies significantly across service areas, with elderly services requiring targeted support. The NSS is a valid and practical tool for capturing staff perceptions of safety and can complement broader safety culture assessments. Its simplicity enables frequent monitoring and timely interventions, supporting continuous improvement in healthcare safety.
OBJECTIVE: To examine patient and client safety culture within a well-being services county in Finland from the perspective of employees.
METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted using the Finnish version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (SOPS 2.0) and the Net Safety Score (NSS). The sample included 2623 staff members from hospital, social and health and elderly services. Descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, Pearson correlations and linear regressions were used to analyse differences and associations.
RESULTS: Among the SOPS dimensions, teamwork received the highest positive ratings (71.1%), whereas handoffs and information exchange scored the lowest (22.6%). Significant differences were observed across service areas, with elderly services consistently reporting lower scores. All safety culture dimensions were significantly correlated with the NSS. Regression analysis identified teamwork, staffing and work pace and organisational learning as the strongest significant predictors of the NSS in all the service areas. The overall proportion of positive responses for NSS was 52.6%. The model explained 47.4% of the variance in NSS in hospital services, 47.0% in elderly services and 35.8% in social and health services.
CONCLUSIONS: Patient and client safety culture varies significantly across service areas, with elderly services requiring targeted support. The NSS is a valid and practical tool for capturing staff perceptions of safety and can complement broader safety culture assessments. Its simplicity enables frequent monitoring and timely interventions, supporting continuous improvement in healthcare safety.