MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/09273948.2019.1681474

Медицинская библиотека · Ocular immunology and inflammation · 2019

Comparison of Ranibizumab versus Aflibercept in Treating Macular Edema among Patients with Serous Retinal Detachment Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.

Küçük Bekir, Sirakaya Ender, Karaca Cagatay

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Purpose: To compare the effectiveness of ranibizumab and aflibercept in macular edema (ME) with serous retinal detachment (SRD) following branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Methods

Once every month for 3 months, 33 patients were treated with ranibizumab (Group 1), whereas 30 others were treated with aflibercept (Group 2). In 9 months after that, patients were evaluated every 4 weeks and received additional injections if they met prespecified criteria for retreatment. Corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), and height of SRD was measured.

Results

During the first 3 months, the improvement of CFT, BCVA, and height of SRD were greater in Group 2 than Group 1. Those differences disappeared in the subsequent 9 months, and changes in CFT, BCVA, and height of SRD were similar between groups at all other visits.

Conclusion

Aflibercept was more effective than ranibizumab from baseline to Month 3 in ME with SRD following BRVO.

Для цитирования: Küçük Bekir, Sirakaya Ender, Karaca Cagatay. Comparison of Ranibizumab versus Aflibercept in Treating Macular Edema among Patients with Serous Retinal Detachment Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.. Ocular immunology and inflammation. 2019. DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2019.1681474.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.