Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP · 2019
Sociopolitical change and transgender people's perceptions of vulnerability and resilience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Bockting Walter, Barucco Renato, LeBlanc Allen, Singh Anneliese, Mellman William, Dolezal Curtis, Ehrhardt Anke
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) people have gained visibility in public discourse leading to greater awareness, understanding, and social change. However, progress made in policies to combat stigma and improve public accommodation and healthcare for this minority population have been targeted for reversal, particularly since the 2016 presidential election. This study investigated the impact of changes in sociopolitical climate on perceptions of vulnerability and resilience among participants of a longitudinal study of transgender identity development.
METHODS: We randomly selected 19 TGNC participants in New York, San Francisco, and Atlanta, and conducted in-depth interviews about their perceptions of societal progress and setbacks, community engagement, and desired future change. Participants ranged in age from 18 to 68; half (47.4%) identified their gender identity along the feminine spectrum (male assigned at birth) and the other half (52.6%) along the masculine spectrum (female assigned at birth).
RESULTS: Content analysis revealed that greater media visibility was perceived as both positive (improved awareness of needs) and negative (increased vulnerability to stigma). Setbacks included concerns about personal safety, the safety of others (particularly those with multiple stigmatized identities), healthcare access, and policies regarding public accommodation and nondiscrimination protections. Coping strategies included social support, activism and resistance, and an enduring sense of optimism about the future.
CONCLUSION: TGNC Americans, in spite of a long history of adversity, are resilient. Participants demonstrated unwavering motivation to create a better future for themselves, other minorities, and society. Research is needed to quantify the impact of policy changes on health and wellbeing, and identify moderators of resilience amenable to intervention.
METHODS: We randomly selected 19 TGNC participants in New York, San Francisco, and Atlanta, and conducted in-depth interviews about their perceptions of societal progress and setbacks, community engagement, and desired future change. Participants ranged in age from 18 to 68; half (47.4%) identified their gender identity along the feminine spectrum (male assigned at birth) and the other half (52.6%) along the masculine spectrum (female assigned at birth).
RESULTS: Content analysis revealed that greater media visibility was perceived as both positive (improved awareness of needs) and negative (increased vulnerability to stigma). Setbacks included concerns about personal safety, the safety of others (particularly those with multiple stigmatized identities), healthcare access, and policies regarding public accommodation and nondiscrimination protections. Coping strategies included social support, activism and resistance, and an enduring sense of optimism about the future.
CONCLUSION: TGNC Americans, in spite of a long history of adversity, are resilient. Participants demonstrated unwavering motivation to create a better future for themselves, other minorities, and society. Research is needed to quantify the impact of policy changes on health and wellbeing, and identify moderators of resilience amenable to intervention.