MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1855865

Медицинская библиотека · Frontiers in microbiology · 2026

Evaluation of a rapid, direct sample loading electrochemical AST assay with clinical urine samples.

Riester Oliver, Kolesnik-Goldmann Natalia, Quiblier Chantal, Krames Wilhelm Eugen Andreas, Nolte Oliver, Deigner Hans-Peter

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) is essential, but conventional culture-based methods require 48-72 h, delaying targeted treatment. Here we report a first small study of a direct electrochemical AST system on clinical urine samples. The study aimed to validate the technology and support further research.

METHODS

18 urine and 2 control samples were tested with 3 antibiotics above and below EUCAST breakpoints, resulting in 474 antibiotic-sample combinations grouped as 158 triplets.

RESULTS

Using routine clinical diagnostics as reference method, categorical agreement, sensitivity, and specificity were 87.9% (95% CI, 83.7-91.1%), 0.95 (95% CI, 0.8952-0.9769) and 0.831 (95% CI, 0.7684-0.8786), respectively. The average time to result was 6.0 ± 3.3 h. Its non-species-specific electrochemical principle theoretically allows it to be applied to various sample types and organisms.

DISCUSSION: These results demonstrate that the electrochemical AST platform provides accurate results on the same day directly from patient samples, likely eliminating the need for mandatory pre-culturing.

Для цитирования: Riester Oliver, Kolesnik-Goldmann Natalia, Quiblier Chantal, Krames Wilhelm Eugen Andreas, Nolte Oliver, Deigner Hans-Peter. Evaluation of a rapid, direct sample loading electrochemical AST assay with clinical urine samples.. Frontiers in microbiology. 2026. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2026.1855865.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.