MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jiac.2023.06.011

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy · 2023

The incidence and factors of inappropriate rapid antigen test usage for group A streptococcus.

Ito Hiroshi, Nakashima Toshiya, Oshida Jura, Fukui Sayato, Kodama Taisuke, Kobayashi Daiki

Наблюдательное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Although rapid antigen tests (RADTs) for group A streptococcus (GAS) can help diagnose group A streptococcal pharyngitis, little is known about the inappropriate use of these RADTs.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study compared the appropriate vs. inappropriate use of RADTs in patients who had a RADT between January 2019 and August 2022. RADTs for patients with a low Centor score of 0-1 point were deemed inappropriate.

RESULTS

Of the 1015 patients, 380 (37.4%) had inappropriate RADTs. Patients with asthma were associated with an increased risk of inappropriate testing. In contrast, during the coronavirus 2019 pandemic, outpatients and residents were associated with a reduced risk of inappropriate testing. Consequent to the inappropriate use of RADTs, 162 (16.0%) patients received potentially inappropriate antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that diagnostic stewardship for pharyngitis, including education for healthcare workers, is needed to reduce inappropriate test ordering and prevent unnecessary care.

Для цитирования: Ito Hiroshi, Nakashima Toshiya, Oshida Jura, Fukui Sayato, Kodama Taisuke, Kobayashi Daiki. The incidence and factors of inappropriate rapid antigen test usage for group A streptococcus.. Journal of infection and chemotherapy : official journal of the Japan Society of Chemotherapy. 2023. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2023.06.011.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.