Gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Endocrinology · 2026
Inter-rater reliability and clinical utility of the modified ferriman-gallwey scale in routine practice.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chongaroonngamsang Irena, Matemanosak Phawat, Suwanrath Chitkasaem, Peeyananjarassri Krantarat, Khwankaew Noppasin, Geater Alan
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the reliability and clinical utility of the modified Ferriman-Gallwey (mFG) score in routine practice when applied by clinicians with differing experience and by patients for self-assessment.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional reliability study, 43 reproductive-aged women were assessed for hirsutism. Three clinicians (reproductive endocrinologist, general gynecologist, and resident) independently scored participants using the mFG scale, and patients self-graded their hirsutism. Inter-rater reliability was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and weighted kappa statistics by body area. Clinical agreement was assessed with Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOA).
RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was good (ICC = 0.649), higher between experienced clinicians (ICC = 0.723) and lower when the resident was included (ICC = 0.588). Weighted kappa ranged from 0.118 to 0.832 (highest for chin, lowest for upper back). Bland-Altman analysis showed substantial disagreement: experienced pair bias -0.74 (LOA -6.94 to + 5.46) and less-experienced pair bias + 0.44 (LOA -7.22 to + 8.11). Patient self-scoring showed poor agreement with clinician scoring (ICC = 0.20).
CONCLUSIONS: Although clinician scoring demonstrated good statistical reliability, inter-rater differences remained clinically meaningful, with LOA exceeding diagnostic thresholds for hirsutism. Greater experience improved agreement but did not eliminate variability. Patient self-scoring showed low agreement with experts and tended to overestimate severity; however, it may function as a high-sensitivity screening adjunct rather than a substitute for clinician assessment.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional reliability study, 43 reproductive-aged women were assessed for hirsutism. Three clinicians (reproductive endocrinologist, general gynecologist, and resident) independently scored participants using the mFG scale, and patients self-graded their hirsutism. Inter-rater reliability was examined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and weighted kappa statistics by body area. Clinical agreement was assessed with Bland-Altman limits of agreement (LOA).
RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was good (ICC = 0.649), higher between experienced clinicians (ICC = 0.723) and lower when the resident was included (ICC = 0.588). Weighted kappa ranged from 0.118 to 0.832 (highest for chin, lowest for upper back). Bland-Altman analysis showed substantial disagreement: experienced pair bias -0.74 (LOA -6.94 to + 5.46) and less-experienced pair bias + 0.44 (LOA -7.22 to + 8.11). Patient self-scoring showed poor agreement with clinician scoring (ICC = 0.20).
CONCLUSIONS: Although clinician scoring demonstrated good statistical reliability, inter-rater differences remained clinically meaningful, with LOA exceeding diagnostic thresholds for hirsutism. Greater experience improved agreement but did not eliminate variability. Patient self-scoring showed low agreement with experts and tended to overestimate severity; however, it may function as a high-sensitivity screening adjunct rather than a substitute for clinician assessment.