DOI 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.03.003
Office-Based Laser Therapy in Vocal Fold Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
To analyze voice outcomes and lesion regression in patients with vocal fold polyps treated in-office using lasers.
STUDY
DESIGN
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
The search was performed in the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases using the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analyses framework. There were no limitations to the year of publication and the search included studies looking at voice outcomes and lesion evolution of in-office laser treatment for vocal fold polyps measured through voice-handicap index, GRB, acoustic analysis or aerodynamics measures. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's ROBINS-I tool for observational studies. Data analysis was performed SPSS software with a significance level of 5%.
RESULTS
We identified 167 articles, 10 of which met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The total number of participants was 242. Meta-analysis showed significant improvement in voice handicap index-10 scores (95% CI, [0.86; 1.45]) and decrease in GRB score (95% CI, [1.09; 4.13]) after in-office laser therapy. It also showed significant improvement in percent shimmer (95% CI, [0.26; 1.01]), and significant increase in maximum phonation time (95% CI, [-0.92; -0.18]).
CONCLUSIONS
Laser therapy an outpatient office setting is a reliable alternative to classical phono-microsurgery. Results show Office-based laser therapy of vocal fold polyps results in a significant improvement in subjective voice outcomes measures. This subjective improvement in voice quality is associated with partial or complete disease regression on laryngeal examination and an increase in maximum phonation time. Ovlaryngeal examination in patients with polyps treated with in-office laser.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.