Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Boston Keratoprosthesis Type I and Repetitive Penetrating Keratoplasty for Refractory Keratopathy.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical efficacy of Boston Keratoprosthesis type I (B-KProI) and penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) for patients with refractory keratopathy after 1failed PKP in China.

METHOD: The 42 consecutive cases with refractory keratopathy after 1 failed PKP, from July 2010 to December 2014, were divided into 2 groups according to the surgical method: KPro group (n = 21) and PKP group (n = 21). Visual acuity (LogMAR), corneal graft transparency, postoperative complications and corneal graft survival rate were observed. The follow-up time was 2 years. The Kaplan-Meier curve was used to analyze the survival rate of the two groups of corneal grafts.

RESULTS

The average best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months in KPro group were significantly lower than PKP group (P < 0.01). The best postoperative visual acuity and BCVA at postoperative 2 years in KPro group were lower than PKP group. The success rate of KPro group (86%) were significantly higher than PKP group (43%) (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences in indicate of complications in 2 groups including secondary glaucoma, secondary infectious corneal ulcer, corneal graft melting and endophthalmitis (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with repetitive PKP, B-KProI had a higher success rate, improved postoperative visual acuity, reduced postoperative corneal transplant rejection rates and improved corneal graft survival rate.