MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.7759/cureus.54527

Медицинская библиотека · Cureus · 2024

Benign or by Chance: A Case Report on Incidental Appendectomy Revealing a Neuroendocrine Tumor During Traumatic Exploratory Laparotomy.

Douglass Megan B, Carpenter Sheldon L, Campbell Cayla H, Hoffman Chase, Hessey Jacob

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Incidental appendectomies (IAs) are often performed in laparotomies to prevent future complications caused by the buildup of scar tissue. Although neoplastic findings are rare, all appendectomy specimens should be sent for histopathological analysis. We present the case of a 38-year-old man found to have an appendiceal neuroendocrine tumor (NET) after receiving an IA secondary to a traumatic rectal perforation requiring exploratory laparotomy. Well-differentiated NETs isolated to the appendix have an excellent prognosis. Appendectomies are considered curative for NETs smaller than 2 cm that have not metastasized beyond the appendix. Appendiceal NETs are capable of secreting vasoactive substances and, therefore, causing carcinoid syndrome. However, the progression to carcinoid syndrome generally coincides with metastasis to the liver, indicating a poor prognosis. While histopathological analysis of appendectomy specimens rarely yields atypical findings, this analysis is crucial to ensure that the proper treatment is selected based on tumor progression in an appendectomy specimen staining positive for somatotropin and chromogranin.

Для цитирования: Douglass Megan B, Carpenter Sheldon L, Campbell Cayla H, Hoffman Chase, Hessey Jacob. Benign or by Chance: A Case Report on Incidental Appendectomy Revealing a Neuroendocrine Tumor During Traumatic Exploratory Laparotomy.. Cureus. 2024. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54527.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.