Secondary intraocular lens implantation with absence of capsular support: Scleral versus iris fixation.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcomes of iris fixated (IF) posterior chamber (PC) intraocular lens (IOL) versus scleral-fixated (SF) PC IOL implantation, and compare them with the results reviewed from the literature.

SETTING

The study took place in the ophthalmology department of the Eye and Ear Hospital (Lebanon).

DESIGN

This is a retrospective institutional study that collected the records of patients admitted for secondary IOL implantation between January 2007 and December 2016.

METHODS

A total of 28 eyes that underwent PC IOL fixation were included, 13 of which underwent trans-scleral PC IOL fixation and 15 of which underwent iris PC IOL fixation. Data were analyzed over a period of 3 years.

RESULTS

Of the 28 patients, 18 (64.3%) were male and 10 (35.7%) were female (mean age at intervention 36.78±23.47 [standard deviation, SD] years). There were no significant intergroup differences with regard to baseline values and demographic characteristics. Trauma was the most common etiology for posterior capsule insufficiency (82.1%). The mean preoperative baseline BCVA was 0.58±0.27 logMAR for SF and 0.27±0.20 logMAR for IF (P=0.07). Both groups had significant improvement in vision during the follow up period. No significant differences were noted regarding early or late postoperative complications between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

SF and IF techniques for PC IOL have similar outcomes and result in a significant improvement in BCVA. When compared to AC (anterior chamber) IOL, both techniques seem to yield fewer complications.