MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/bs.apar.2018.03.005

Медицинская библиотека · Advances in parasitology · 2018

100 Years of Mass Deworming Programmes: A Policy Perspective From the World Bank's Disease Control Priorities Analyses.

Bundy Donald A P, Appleby Laura J, Bradley Mark, Croke Kevin, Hollingsworth T Deirdre, Pullan Rachel, Turner Hugo C, de Silva Nilanthi

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

For more than 100 years, countries have used mass drug administration as a public health response to soil-transmitted helminth infection. The series of analyses published as Disease Control Priorities is the World Bank's vehicle for exploring the cost-effectiveness and value for money of public health interventions. The first edition was published in 1993 as a technical supplement to the World Bank's World Development Report Investing in Health where deworming was used as an illustrative example of value for money in treating diseases with relatively low morbidity but high prevalence. Over the second (2006) and now third (2017) editions deworming has been an increasingly persuasive example to use for this argument. The latest analyses recognize the negative impact of intestinal worm infection on human capital in poor communities and document a continuing decline in worm infection as a result of the combination of high levels of mass treatment and ongoing economic development trends in poor communities.

Для цитирования: Bundy Donald A P, Appleby Laura J, Bradley Mark, Croke Kevin, Hollingsworth T Deirdre, Pullan Rachel, Turner Hugo C, de Silva Nilanthi. 100 Years of Mass Deworming Programmes: A Policy Perspective From the World Bank's Disease Control Priorities Analyses.. Advances in parasitology. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/bs.apar.2018.03.005.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.