MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/ijms23147818

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of molecular sciences · 2022

The Regenerative Effects of c-Met Agonistic Antibodies in Vocal Fold Atrophy.

Choi Hyunsu, Yu Seung-Shin, Choi Jiwon, Kim Choung-Soo

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Atrophy of the vocal folds and the accompanying glottic insufficiency affect the quality of life. Although growth factors have been used to treat muscle atrophy, their effectiveness is limited by their short half-life.

METHODS

In total, 15 rabbits and 24 rats were used for the study. The right recurrent laryngeal nerves of all animals were transected. One month following nerve transection, PBS (PBS group), rHGF (HGF group), or a c-Met agonistic antibody (c-Met group) was injected into the paralyzed vocal folds. The larynges of the rabbits were harvested from each group for histologic examination and subjected to PCR analysis.

RESULTS

Cross-sectional areas (CSAs) of thyroarytenoid muscles were evaluated. The c-Met group had increased CSAs compared to the PBS and HGF groups, but there were no significant differences compared to normal controls. The expression levels of myogenesis-related genes were evaluated three weeks after the injection. The expression levels of myosin heavy chain IIa were significantly increased in the PBS group, while the expression levels of MyoD were increased in the c-Met group.

CONCLUSIONS

The c-Met agonistic antibody showed promise for promoting muscle regeneration in a vocal fold palsy model.

Для цитирования: Choi Hyunsu, Yu Seung-Shin, Choi Jiwon, Kim Choung-Soo. The Regenerative Effects of c-Met Agonistic Antibodies in Vocal Fold Atrophy.. International journal of molecular sciences. 2022. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23147818.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.