MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/jisp.jisp_321_25

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology · 2026

Comparative efficacy of different anesthetic techniques on pain perception during nonsurgical periodontal treatment: A parallel, blinded, randomized controlled trial.

Cabral Gabriel Andreani, Huller Daniela, Mecca Leomar Emanuel Almeida, Bandeca Shelon Cristina Souza, Moraes Gustavo Simão, Santos Fábio André Dos

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Nonsurgical periodontal treatment improves clinical parameters; however, the procedure is often associated with patient discomfort. Pain control should be considered during periodontal instrumentation. This study evaluated pain perception during periodontal instrumentation using computerized anesthesia versus a noninvasive lidocaine/prilocaine gel.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A parallel, blinded, randomized, clinical trial included 76 volunteers receiving either invasive anesthesia with a computerized device, or noninvasive anesthesia with lidocaine/prilocaine gel during nonsurgical periodontal instrumentation. Pain perception was assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale and anxiety with the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale. Anesthetic supplementation needs were recorded, and hemodynamic parameters were measured before and after anesthesia. Statistical analyses used the t-test or Mann-Whitney test for quantitative variables. Qualitative variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Participants included 45 women and 31 men (mean age of 44.2 ± 12.9 years), with no significant differences in age or sex between groups. Pain intensity was similar between groups. Anxiety was similar among participants, most having low anxiety (P > 0.05). The need for supplementary anesthesia differed significantly between groups. All patients (38; 100%) in the noninvasive group required additional anesthesia. In the invasive group, only nine patients (24%) required additional anesthesia (P < 0.001). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, along with oxygen saturation, remained stable, with no relevant variations among the study groups.

CONCLUSION

Both techniques provided similar pain control during periodontal instrumentation; however, the noninvasive gel required significantly more supplementary anesthesia in comparison with the computerized-controlled system. Pretreatment anxiety levels were low and comparable between groups.

Для цитирования: Cabral Gabriel Andreani, Huller Daniela, Mecca Leomar Emanuel Almeida, Bandeca Shelon Cristina Souza, Moraes Gustavo Simão, Santos Fábio André Dos. Comparative efficacy of different anesthetic techniques on pain perception during nonsurgical periodontal treatment: A parallel, blinded, randomized controlled trial.. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. 2026. DOI: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_321_25.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.