Acta ophthalmologica · 2023
Comparison of surgical outcomes of Carlevale sutureless scleral fixation and Artisan Aphakia intraocular lens.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Van Severen V, Maaijwee K J M, Pennekamp C W A, Feenstra H M A, van Dijk E H C, Lindstedt E W, Bamonte G
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare intra- and postoperative results of sutureless scleral fixated Carlevale intraocular lens (IOL) with iris fixated Artisan IOL.
METHODS: Monocentre, retrospective analysis of refractive outcomes and intra- and postoperative complications of patients who received a Carlevale or Artisan IOL between January 2019 and March 2022.
RESULTS: 178 eyes of 169 patients were included (101 Carlevale and 77 Artisan IOLs). The standard follow-up time was 1 month. Two statistically significant differences were found: in the deviation of the postoperative spherical equivalent of the refraction from the preoperative chosen IOL target (p = 0.019; mean deviation was -0.46 in the Carlevale and 0.08 in the Artisan group), and the number of eyes with complications between the Carlevale and Artisan groups (p = 0.003; 33 in the Carlevale and 42 in the Artisan group).
CONCLUSION: The current study is the largest so far comparing both refractive outcomes and complications after implantation of Carlevale and Artisan IOL. The Carlevale IOL does not carry a greater complication risk on the short-term follow-up. This provides additional evidence that the Carlevale IOL has to be added to the armamentarium of the ophthalmic surgeon.
METHODS: Monocentre, retrospective analysis of refractive outcomes and intra- and postoperative complications of patients who received a Carlevale or Artisan IOL between January 2019 and March 2022.
RESULTS: 178 eyes of 169 patients were included (101 Carlevale and 77 Artisan IOLs). The standard follow-up time was 1 month. Two statistically significant differences were found: in the deviation of the postoperative spherical equivalent of the refraction from the preoperative chosen IOL target (p = 0.019; mean deviation was -0.46 in the Carlevale and 0.08 in the Artisan group), and the number of eyes with complications between the Carlevale and Artisan groups (p = 0.003; 33 in the Carlevale and 42 in the Artisan group).
CONCLUSION: The current study is the largest so far comparing both refractive outcomes and complications after implantation of Carlevale and Artisan IOL. The Carlevale IOL does not carry a greater complication risk on the short-term follow-up. This provides additional evidence that the Carlevale IOL has to be added to the armamentarium of the ophthalmic surgeon.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansRetrospective StudiesFemaleMaleScleraVisual AcuityAgedRefraction, OcularSutureless Surgical ProceduresMiddle AgedLens Implantation, IntraocularFollow-Up StudiesProsthesis DesignPostoperative ComplicationsAphakia, PostcataractLenses, IntraocularTreatment OutcomeAdultAged, 80 and overSuture Techniques