Videolaryngoscopy Quality with Protective Cover of Intraoral Odontologic Camera Evaluation in Vocal Fold Coverage Lesions.

INTRODUCTION

The examination of the larynx with indirect visualization is one of a series of steps in otorhinolaryngological evaluation. In the past this exam was performed more commonly with mirrors and headlights, but for at least the last four decades physicians have resorted to assessing the laryngopharynx with both rigid and fiberoptic instruments. The rigid 70° laryngoscope is the most used in our practice, its main drawback being the time-consuming resterilization process needed between scope usages in different patients. Recently we have been using a disposable protective cover over the rigid scope to obviate instrument contamination and thus the office time delays.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the maintenance of image quality in videolaryngoscopy (VDL), with and without a protective cover of intraoral odontologic camera (PCIOC), in patients with benign lesions of the vocal fold.

METHODS

Quantitative and accurate cross-sectional study of VDL images with and without PCIOC. The images were captured by videolaringoscope of digital camera chip-on-the-tip type in an otorhinolaryngological care center. We studied patients presenting with vocal fold nodules, intracordal cysts, polyps, and Reinke's edema. All judges evaluating the images were otorhinolaryngologists. The exams with and without PCIOC were presented in a randomized form. The data of professionals' answers were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics and application of variables association tests.

RESULTS

Thirty professionals participated in the study. There was no statistically significant difference between the probability of success in exams performed with or without PCIOC, nor between the perception of image quality and the number of correct answers in the diagnosis. In the polyp lesion without PCIOC there was a statistically significant difference between the confidence level of the diagnosis (and the number of correct answers (P = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

There is no difference between VDL diagnoses of vocal fold coverage lesions with and without PCIOC, maintaining image quality in both VDL exams.