Diagnostic and prognostic trajectories of interstitial lung diseases after the multidisciplinary discussion.

BACKGROUND

The 2018 guidelines on the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) conditionally recommend multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) for diagnostic decision-making. However, limited data concerning the diagnostic impact of MDD on interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are available.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this prospective study was to assess the impact of MDD at a tertiary referral ILD center on diagnostic trajectories, prognosis, and identification of potential treatable traits in ILD management.

DESIGN

This prospective study enrolled all consecutive adult ILD patients referred for MDD to a tertiary academic center in San Antonio, TX, USA from January 2017 to May 2020. The subjects were followed during a 3-year follow-up period after the MDD.

METHODS

Patients were stratified into three groups according to the pre-MDD diagnosis: unspecified ILD, IPF, and not IPF, and compared to the re-stratification post-MDD diagnosis into: unclassifiable ILD, IPF, and not IPF. The primary outcome was the percentage change in diagnostic trajectories after the MDD discussion.

RESULTS

A total of 201 ILD patients (61.7% male; mean (DS) age: 67.2 (10.4) years) were included in the study. The total diagnostic trajectory change occurred in 122 (60.7%) patients. The diagnostic trajectories changed in 40 (46.5%) patients in the IPF group and 8 (19.5%) in the non-IPF group (p-value = 0.0003). Patients with pre-MDD unspecified-ILD were classified as not-IPF in 32.4% (n = 24), IPF in 23% (n = 17), and unclassifiable-ILD in 44.6% (n = 33) post-MDD. Considering the post-MDD diagnosis, differences in mortality were detected among the three groups (p = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that MDD has a significant impact not only on the diagnostic trajectories (DT) but also on the prognosis of patients with ILDs.