MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.014

Медицинская библиотека · Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2018

Medical Treatments for Acromegaly: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Leonart Letícia P, Ferreira Vinicius L, Tonin Fernanda S, Fernandez-Llimos Fernando, Pontarolo Roberto

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорNetwork Meta-AnalysisПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Acromegaly results from the hypersecretion of growth hormone. Because of the low incidence rates of this disease worldwide, few clinical trials evaluating drug treatments have been conducted.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct the first network meta-analysis simultaneously comparing all available drugs used in acromegaly treatment so as to provide more robust evidence in this field.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Cochrane Collaboration recommendations (PROSPERO database under the registration number CRD42017059880). The electronic searches were conducted in PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Randomized controlled trials comparing any drug for the treatment of acromegaly head-to-head or versus placebo were included. Outcomes concerning the efficacy and safety of treatments were evaluated. The statistical analyses were performed using Aggregate Data Drug Information System version 1.16.8 (drugis.org, Groningen, The Netherlands).

RESULTS

The initial search retrieved 2059 articles. Of these, 10 randomized controlled trials were included in a qualitative analysis and 7 in a quantitative analysis. The network meta-analysis for the efficacy outcome (number of patients achieving insulinlike growth factor 1 control) showed that pegvisomant and lanreotide autogel were statistically superior to placebo (odds ratio [95% credible interval] 0.06 [0.00-0.55] and 0.09 [0.01-0.88]). No further differences were found. The probability rank indicated that pegvisomant and pasireotide have the highest probabilities (33% and 34%, respectively) of being the best therapeutic options. No major side effects were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Pegvisomant is still a good option for acromegaly treatment, but pasireotide seems to be a promising alternative. Nevertheless, other important key factors such as drug costs and effectiveness (real-world results) should be taken into account when selecting acromegaly treatment.

Для цитирования: Leonart Letícia P, Ferreira Vinicius L, Tonin Fernanda S, Fernandez-Llimos Fernando, Pontarolo Roberto. Medical Treatments for Acromegaly: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.. Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.014.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.