Pathogen reduction combined with rapid diagnostic tests to reduce the risk of transfusion-transmitted infections in Uganda.

BACKGROUND

Blood safety and transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs) are a major concern in low-resource areas. Laboratory screening of donors, a key contributor to blood safety, is usually done by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods, which use expensive reagents and necessitate complex instruments and sophisticated laboratory staff. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are less expensive and easier to perform but have less sensitivity. Pathogen reduction technology (PRT) reduces transfusion transmission of malaria and may be effective in decreasing other TTIs. We explored the potential to improve blood safety by combining PRT and RDTs in comparison with current ELISA testing.

STUDY DESIGN AND

METHODS

We identified the sensitivity of RDTs available in Uganda and the sensitivity of currently used ELISA. Data from a riboflavin-and-UV-based photochemical treatment PRT were used. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and malaria were studied. Probability models were developed for estimation of the number of infectious units of blood for each of these four infections using either current ELISA or the combination of RDT and PRT.

RESULTS

Compared to currently used ELISA, the combination of RDTs and PRT could reduce the rate of infectious units by 100, 20, 98, and 83% for HIV, HBV, HCV, and malaria, respectively, and would prevent use of 758 units of infectious blood per 10,000 units transfused.

CONCLUSION

The combination of RDTs and PRT may improve blood safety in low-resource areas.