MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/ped.70500

Медицинская библиотека · Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society · 2026

High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Conventional Therapy After Slide Tracheoplasty.

Uematsu Ayano, Morita Keiichi, Hatakeyama Tadashi, Aoki Kazunori, Kurosawa Hiroshi, Bitoh Yuko

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Few studies have focused on the respiratory management after slide tracheoplasty. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) compared with conventional therapy in preventing reintubation after slide tracheoplasty.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study conducted at a single center, the Department of Pediatric Surgery. The medical records of 68 patients who had undergone slide tracheoplasty for congenital tracheal stenosis (CTS) before the age of 2 years from February 2012 to September 2021 were included. Patients were divided into group C (conventional therapy) or H (HFNC therapy), based on whether conventional oxygen therapy and positive pressure ventilation or HFNC was used after withdrawal from the ventilator, respectively.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the postoperative reintubation rate and ventilator dependency between groups C and H. There were no HFNC complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of postoperative HFNC is not inferior to noninvasive ventilation in terms of therapeutic efficacy. HFNC can be used without complications for a limited time after extubation.

Для цитирования: Uematsu Ayano, Morita Keiichi, Hatakeyama Tadashi, Aoki Kazunori, Kurosawa Hiroshi, Bitoh Yuko. High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Conventional Therapy After Slide Tracheoplasty.. Pediatrics international : official journal of the Japan Pediatric Society. 2026. DOI: 10.1111/ped.70500.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.