Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
A Comparative Clinical Study of 0.50% Versus 0.75% Pilocarpine Eye Drops for Improving Visual Performance in Presbyopia.
Clinical StudyСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fu Dan, Han Tian, Wang Qiyu, Geng Jingbin, Gu Shulong, Ji Yuanjie, Huang Taomin, Zhou Xingtao, Xu Ye
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of 0.50% and 0.75% pilocarpine ophthalmic solutions for treating presbyopia.
METHODS: In this prospective study, 22 presbyopic subjects (44 eyes) were assigned to use 0.50% or 0.75% pilocarpine bilaterally, once daily for 2 weeks. Primary outcomes included distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) at 66 cm and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) at 40 cm under photopic and mesopic conditions, pupil size, refractive error, intraocular pressure (IOP) and patient-reported adverse events. Assessments were conducted at baseline, day 1 (after 1 and 6 h) and week 2 (after 1 h).
RESULTS: No serious adverse events occurred. Neither formulation affected IOP or refractive error significantly. Pupil constriction was greater in the 0.75% group than the 0.50% group (2.8 ± 1.1 vs. 2.0 ± 0.8 mm, p = 0.02). After 2 weeks, the gain in photopic DCNVA was 0.18 logMAR for both concentrations (p = 0.70). The respective gain in visual acuity measures for the 0.75% and 0.50% groups was: mesopic DCNVA, 0.14 and 0.19 logMAR (p = 0.25); photopic DCIVA, 0.14 and 0.09 logMAR (p = 0.02); mesopic DCIVA, 0.12 and 0.10 logMAR (p = 0.18).
CONCLUSION: Both 0.50% and 0.75% pilocarpine improved visual performance in presbyopia significantly, suggesting it is a promising treatment option.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), 2023/3/2, No.ChiCTR2300068971.
METHODS: In this prospective study, 22 presbyopic subjects (44 eyes) were assigned to use 0.50% or 0.75% pilocarpine bilaterally, once daily for 2 weeks. Primary outcomes included distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (DCIVA) at 66 cm and distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) at 40 cm under photopic and mesopic conditions, pupil size, refractive error, intraocular pressure (IOP) and patient-reported adverse events. Assessments were conducted at baseline, day 1 (after 1 and 6 h) and week 2 (after 1 h).
RESULTS: No serious adverse events occurred. Neither formulation affected IOP or refractive error significantly. Pupil constriction was greater in the 0.75% group than the 0.50% group (2.8 ± 1.1 vs. 2.0 ± 0.8 mm, p = 0.02). After 2 weeks, the gain in photopic DCNVA was 0.18 logMAR for both concentrations (p = 0.70). The respective gain in visual acuity measures for the 0.75% and 0.50% groups was: mesopic DCNVA, 0.14 and 0.19 logMAR (p = 0.25); photopic DCIVA, 0.14 and 0.09 logMAR (p = 0.02); mesopic DCIVA, 0.12 and 0.10 logMAR (p = 0.18).
CONCLUSION: Both 0.50% and 0.75% pilocarpine improved visual performance in presbyopia significantly, suggesting it is a promising treatment option.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), 2023/3/2, No.ChiCTR2300068971.