Eye (London, England) · 2023
'Structural OCT changes distinguishing between myopic macular haemorrhages due to choroidal neovascularization and spontaneous Bruch's membrane rupture: the "myopic 2 binary reflective sign".
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mularoni Cecilia, Servillo Andrea, Sacconi Riccardo, Battista Marco, Crincoli Emanuele, Crepaldi Anna, Querques Lea, Bandello Francesco, Querques Giuseppe
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of structural optical coherence tomography (OCT) in comparison to fluorescein angiography (FA) and OCT angiography (OCTA) in discerning between macular haemorrhages (MH) due to myopic choroidal neovascularization (m-CNV) and idiopathic macular haemorrhage (IMH) in myopic patients and to suggest a new OCT biomarker to discern these two entities.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this longitudinal retrospective study, patients affected by MH and pathological myopia were included. All patients underwent OCTA and FA to discern bleeding from m-CNV or IMH. Furthermore, all patients underwent a structural OCT and 2 expert graders evaluated the presence of the myopic 2 binary reflective sign as a biomarker to discern between IMH and bleeding from m-CNV.
RESULTS: Forty-seven eyes of 47 patients were enrolled. By means of angiographic examinations, 34 out of 47 eyes with MH (57%) were diagnosed as m-CNV, whereas 13 eyes (43%) as IMH. Using structural OCT, the graders identified the presence of the myopic 2 binary reflective sign in 13 out of 13 eyes with IMH. In 33 out of 34 cases with m-CNV, the 2 graders established the absence of the sign. This accounted for 100% of sensibility and 97% of specificity of structural OCT in discerning between MH from m-CNV and IMH.
CONCLUSION: Structural OCT can discern with good reliability between IMH and bleeding from m-CNV based on the presence/ absence of the myopic 2 binary reflective sign. This could be of paramount relevance in the clinical setting for the diagnosis and treatment of HM patients.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS: In this longitudinal retrospective study, patients affected by MH and pathological myopia were included. All patients underwent OCTA and FA to discern bleeding from m-CNV or IMH. Furthermore, all patients underwent a structural OCT and 2 expert graders evaluated the presence of the myopic 2 binary reflective sign as a biomarker to discern between IMH and bleeding from m-CNV.
RESULTS: Forty-seven eyes of 47 patients were enrolled. By means of angiographic examinations, 34 out of 47 eyes with MH (57%) were diagnosed as m-CNV, whereas 13 eyes (43%) as IMH. Using structural OCT, the graders identified the presence of the myopic 2 binary reflective sign in 13 out of 13 eyes with IMH. In 33 out of 34 cases with m-CNV, the 2 graders established the absence of the sign. This accounted for 100% of sensibility and 97% of specificity of structural OCT in discerning between MH from m-CNV and IMH.
CONCLUSION: Structural OCT can discern with good reliability between IMH and bleeding from m-CNV based on the presence/ absence of the myopic 2 binary reflective sign. This could be of paramount relevance in the clinical setting for the diagnosis and treatment of HM patients.