DOI 10.1016/j.brachy.2026.04.013
Deep learning-based automatic segmentation of rectal tumors in endoscopic images.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Endoscopy is critical in the identification of rectal tumors, but is prone to observer errors. The aim of this study was to assess the inter- and intra-observer variability in delineating rectal lesions in endoscopic images taken during high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy and develop a deep learning-based automatic tumor segmentation model.
MATERIALS AND
METHODS
Three expert annotators identified tumors, scaring, ulcers and radiation proctitis in 801 endoscopic images from 24 patients. Inter-observer variability was evaluated at both whole-image and contour levels. Intra-observer variability was assessed by re-annotating 15 images from 14 patients after six months. Four DeepLabV3 models with a ResNet50 backbone were trained using a nested cross-validation approach: one per annotator and a fourth trained on majority-vote contours. Model performance was evaluated on 60 unseen images, which the annotators rated using a five-point Likert scale.
RESULTS
Manual annotations showed significant variability for ulcers and radiation proctitis (average Dice: 0.36 and 0.57) versus tumors (0.83). Intra-observer Dice scores were 0.72, 0.68, and 0.87 across annotators. The majority-vote model outperformed individual annotator models (average Dice: 0.77) but generated many false positives, misclassifying ulcers and proctitis as tumors. Annotators generally rated the model trained on their own contours higher on the unseen test set.
CONCLUSIONS
This work highlights the variability in expert annotations used as ground-truth for deep learning-based segmentation of rectal tumors in endoscopic images acquired during HDR brachytherapy. Automated contouring may provide a foundation for adaptive, AI-assisted brachytherapy workflows.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.