Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2015
6R-tetrahydrobiopterin treated PKU patients below 4 years of age: Physical outcomes, nutrition and genotype.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Aldámiz-Echevarría Luis, Bueno María A, Couce María L, Lage Sergio, Dalmau Jaime, Vitoria Isidro, Llarena Marta, Andrade Fernando, Blasco Javier, Alcalde Carlos, Gil David, García María C, González-Lamuño Domingo, Ruiz Mónica, Ruiz María A, Peña-Quintana Luis, González David, Sánchez-Valverde Felix
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Phenylalanine-restricted diets have proven effective in treating phenylketonuria. However, such diets have occasionally been reported to hinder normal development. Our study aimed to assess whether treating 0-4-year-old phenylketonuric patients with 6R-tetrahydrobiopterin might prevent growth retardation later in life.
METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal retrospective study which examined anthropometric characteristics of phenylketonuric patients on 6R-tetrahydrobiopterin therapy (22 subjects), and compared them with a group of phenylketonuric patients on protein-restricted diets (44 subjects). Nutritional issues were also considered. We further explored possible relationships between mutations in the PAH gene, BH4 responsiveness and growth outcome.
RESULTS: No significant growth improvements were observed in either the group on 6R-tetrahydrobiopterin treatment (height Z-score: initial= -0.57 ± 1.54; final=-0.52 ± 1.29; BMI Z-score: initial=0.17 ± 1.05; final=0.18 ± 1.00) or the diet-only group (height Z-score: initial=-0.92 ± 0.96; final= -0.78 ± 1.08; BMI Z-score: initial=0.17 ± 0.97; final=-0.07 ± 1.03) over the 1-year observation period. Furthermore, we found no significant differences (p>0.05) between the two groups at any of the time points considered (0, 6 and 12 months). Patients on 6R-tetrahydrobiopterin increased their phenylalanine intake (from 49.1 [25.6-60.3] to 56.5 [39.8-68.3] mgkg(-1)day(-1)) and natural protein intake (from 1.0 [0.8-1.7] to 1.5 [1.0-1.8] g kg(-1)day(-1)), and some patients managed to adopt normal diets. Higher phenylalanine and natural protein intakes were positively correlated with better physical outcomes in the diet-only group (p<0.05). No correlation was found between patient genotype and physical outcomes, results being similar regardless of the nutritional approach used. We did not detect any side effects due to 6R-tetrahydrobiopterin administration.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that treating 0-4-year-old phenylketonuric patients with 6R-tetrahydrobiopterin is safe. However, poor developmental outcomes were observed, despite increasing the intake of natural proteins. Genotype could be a valid predictor of tetrahydrobiopterin-responsiveness, since patients who carried the same genotype responded similarly to the 6R-tetrahydrobiopterin loading test. On the other hand, harbouring 6R-tetrahydrobiopterin responsive genotypes did not predispose patients to better physical outcomes.
METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal retrospective study which examined anthropometric characteristics of phenylketonuric patients on 6R-tetrahydrobiopterin therapy (22 subjects), and compared them with a group of phenylketonuric patients on protein-restricted diets (44 subjects). Nutritional issues were also considered. We further explored possible relationships between mutations in the PAH gene, BH4 responsiveness and growth outcome.
RESULTS: No significant growth improvements were observed in either the group on 6R-tetrahydrobiopterin treatment (height Z-score: initial= -0.57 ± 1.54; final=-0.52 ± 1.29; BMI Z-score: initial=0.17 ± 1.05; final=0.18 ± 1.00) or the diet-only group (height Z-score: initial=-0.92 ± 0.96; final= -0.78 ± 1.08; BMI Z-score: initial=0.17 ± 0.97; final=-0.07 ± 1.03) over the 1-year observation period. Furthermore, we found no significant differences (p>0.05) between the two groups at any of the time points considered (0, 6 and 12 months). Patients on 6R-tetrahydrobiopterin increased their phenylalanine intake (from 49.1 [25.6-60.3] to 56.5 [39.8-68.3] mgkg(-1)day(-1)) and natural protein intake (from 1.0 [0.8-1.7] to 1.5 [1.0-1.8] g kg(-1)day(-1)), and some patients managed to adopt normal diets. Higher phenylalanine and natural protein intakes were positively correlated with better physical outcomes in the diet-only group (p<0.05). No correlation was found between patient genotype and physical outcomes, results being similar regardless of the nutritional approach used. We did not detect any side effects due to 6R-tetrahydrobiopterin administration.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that treating 0-4-year-old phenylketonuric patients with 6R-tetrahydrobiopterin is safe. However, poor developmental outcomes were observed, despite increasing the intake of natural proteins. Genotype could be a valid predictor of tetrahydrobiopterin-responsiveness, since patients who carried the same genotype responded similarly to the 6R-tetrahydrobiopterin loading test. On the other hand, harbouring 6R-tetrahydrobiopterin responsive genotypes did not predispose patients to better physical outcomes.