MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/jpr3.12152

Медицинская библиотека · JPGN reports · 2024

Successful use of transcutaneous parasacral stimulation in a patient with myelomeningocele and fecal incontinence: A case report.

Bigliardi Roman, Riera-Canales Claudia, Oviedo Adriana, Ortiz Gonzalo, Fernández Julian, Meduri Santiago, Birsa Patricio, Messere Gabriela, Saps Miguel

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Myelomeningocele is a complex congenital defect that affects the spinal cord and structures associated with it. These patients often have neurogenic bowel and bladder dysfunction with constipation, fecal and urinary incontinence. In addition to dietary modifications, laxatives, and enemas, therapies such as biofeedback and neurostimulation (invasive and noninvasive) are sometimes used. These techniques are rarely available, may require surgical procedures, and are not devoid of complications. We present the case of a 13-year-old boy with myelomeningocele at the L4 level, with constipation, dyssynergic defecation, and fecal incontinence (FI). He was treated with biofeedback achieving partial improvement of FI, and then with transcutaneous electrical neurostimulation (TENS) with subsequent resolution of constipation and FI. To our knowledge, this is the first case report using neurostimulation with TENS applied to the S2-S4 dermatomes in a patient with myelomeningocele. This represents a safe, noninvasive, and low-cost treatment for these patients.

Для цитирования: Bigliardi Roman, Riera-Canales Claudia, Oviedo Adriana, Ortiz Gonzalo, Fernández Julian, Meduri Santiago, Birsa Patricio, Messere Gabriela, Saps Miguel. Successful use of transcutaneous parasacral stimulation in a patient with myelomeningocele and fecal incontinence: A case report.. JPGN reports. 2024. DOI: 10.1002/jpr3.12152.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.