Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2025
Consensus on Safe Initiation and Monitoring of Transanal Irrigation to Optimize Adherence With Therapy.
СтатьяОбзорConsensus StatementНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Emmanuel Anton, Krogh Klaus, Perrouin-Verbe Brigitte, Krassiukov Andrei, Koch Sacha, Mosiello Giovanni, Bazzocchi Gabriele, Christensen Peter, Rodriguez Gianna, Brugaletta Concetta
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Transanal irrigation is a well-established minimally invasive therapy that addresses symptoms of both constipation and incontinence. The therapy has been extended from just neurogenic bowel dysfunction patients to those with disorders of brain-gut interaction and postsurgical conditions.
AIM: To summarized the literature on transanal irrigation and update the contraindication profile.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We undertook a literature review of transanal irrigation complications and outcomes.
RESULTS: Initiation of therapy as part of a bowel care regime is becoming more common outside specialist centers. In addition, the concept of both high- and low-volume irrigation schedules has entered the treatment paradigm, and it is clear that there is a differing safety profile. We present an update from the previous long list of contraindications.
DISCUSSION: We describe how optimizing long-term adherence depends on these factors in addition to a structured follow-up programme.
CONCLUSION: Transanal irrigation is an increasingly used therapy, with a good safety profile, further improved by the advent of low-volume irrigation options. Key to safe and effective usage of transanal irrigation is careful patient selection allied to tailored initial training of the patient.
AIM: To summarized the literature on transanal irrigation and update the contraindication profile.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We undertook a literature review of transanal irrigation complications and outcomes.
RESULTS: Initiation of therapy as part of a bowel care regime is becoming more common outside specialist centers. In addition, the concept of both high- and low-volume irrigation schedules has entered the treatment paradigm, and it is clear that there is a differing safety profile. We present an update from the previous long list of contraindications.
DISCUSSION: We describe how optimizing long-term adherence depends on these factors in addition to a structured follow-up programme.
CONCLUSION: Transanal irrigation is an increasingly used therapy, with a good safety profile, further improved by the advent of low-volume irrigation options. Key to safe and effective usage of transanal irrigation is careful patient selection allied to tailored initial training of the patient.