DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0207959
Quantitative image analysis using chest computed tomography in the evaluation of lymph node involvement in pulmonary sarcoidosis and tuberculosis.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of quantitative analysis of chest computed tomography (CT) scans for the assessment of lymph node (LN) involvement in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and sarcoidosis.
METHODS
In 47 patients with tuberculosis (n = 26) or sarcoidosis (n = 21), 115 lymph nodes (tuberculous, 55; sarcoid, 60) were visually analyzed on chest CT scans according to their size, location, attenuation and shape. Each node was manually segmented using image analysis tool, which was quantitatively analyzed using the following variables: Feret's diameter, perimeter, area, circularity, mean grey value (Mean), standard deviation (SD) of grey value, minimum grey value (Min), maximum grey value (Max), median grey value (Median), skewness, kurtosis, and net enhancement. We statistically analyzed the visual and quantitative CT features of tuberculous and sarcoid LNs.
RESULTS
In visual CT analysis, the mean node size in sarcoidosis was significantly greater than that in tuberculosis. There were no statistical differences between tuberculous and sarcoid LNs in terms of location and shape. Central low attenuation and peripheral rim enhancement were more frequently observed in tuberculous LNs than in the sarcoid ones. In quantitative CT analysis, there were significant differences in the values of the Feret's diameter, perimeter, area, circularity, mean grey value, SD, median, skewness, and kurtosis between tuberculous and sarcoid LNs.
CONCLUSIONS
Quantitative CT analysis using CT parameters with pixel-by-pixel measurements can help to differentiate of tuberculous and sarcoid LNs.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.