Orbit (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2013
Training and oculoplastics: past, present and future.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Saleh George M, Athanasiadis Ioannis, Collin J Richard O
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To describe the evolution of ophthalmic plastic surgical training since the establishment of an oculoplastic subspecialty.
METHODS: A systematic search and consultation was undertaken, involving various oculoplastic societies and selected members, to better define the previous and currently evolving training paradigms in oculoplastics. The salient events along with variances that exist in programs across the world today are analysed.
RESULTS: Oculoplastics emerged as a distillation of expertise from other specialties following World War 2 where a high rate of ophthalmic and oculoplastic trauma had occurred. Following this, learned individuals began aggregating on a regular basis resulting in the formation of dedicated oculoplastic forums, initially in the United States (ASOPRS) and then emerging in Europe (ESOPRS), the UK (BOPSS), South America (SOPANOC), the Far East (APSOPRS), Australia and New Zealand (ANZSOPS), the Middle East and Africa (MEAOPS) and South Africa (SASOPS). More structured and specialist training programmes which were dedicated to clinical and surgical management of adnexal disorders began to develop in parallel. This has resulted in the emergence of specialist adnexal fellowships with regional variation, differences in duration and the opportunity for further subspecialisation.
CONCLUSIONS: Oculoplastic surgery has evolved as a highly specific and rapidly growing sub-specialty dedicated to eyelid, lacrimal and orbital care. Its ever increasing popularity has been mirrored by progressively more structured and recognised training programmes globally.
METHODS: A systematic search and consultation was undertaken, involving various oculoplastic societies and selected members, to better define the previous and currently evolving training paradigms in oculoplastics. The salient events along with variances that exist in programs across the world today are analysed.
RESULTS: Oculoplastics emerged as a distillation of expertise from other specialties following World War 2 where a high rate of ophthalmic and oculoplastic trauma had occurred. Following this, learned individuals began aggregating on a regular basis resulting in the formation of dedicated oculoplastic forums, initially in the United States (ASOPRS) and then emerging in Europe (ESOPRS), the UK (BOPSS), South America (SOPANOC), the Far East (APSOPRS), Australia and New Zealand (ANZSOPS), the Middle East and Africa (MEAOPS) and South Africa (SASOPS). More structured and specialist training programmes which were dedicated to clinical and surgical management of adnexal disorders began to develop in parallel. This has resulted in the emergence of specialist adnexal fellowships with regional variation, differences in duration and the opportunity for further subspecialisation.
CONCLUSIONS: Oculoplastic surgery has evolved as a highly specific and rapidly growing sub-specialty dedicated to eyelid, lacrimal and orbital care. Its ever increasing popularity has been mirrored by progressively more structured and recognised training programmes globally.