Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2024
Impact of Intraventricular Blocks on Cardiac Cycle Dynamics: An Echocardiographic and Vectorcardiographic Analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Duarte Carlos Eduardo, Silva Katia Regina, Jesus Luciene Dias de, Abensur Henry, Costa Roberto
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Left bundle branch block (LBBB) causes delays that alter the mechanics of the ventricular cycle. The effect of other intraventricular blocks (IVB) remains little explored.
OBJECTIVES: To study the phases of the cardiac cycle (CC) and ventricular synchrony in different ventricular activation patterns.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study with 328 consecutive individuals without structural heart disease, normal electrocardiogram or IVB, conducted in the period between August/2020 and January/2022. Echocardiogram and Vectorcardiogram were performed simultaneously to analyze the electromechanics of the CC. A one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni's multiple comparison test was used, with a significance level of 5%.
RESULTS: The age of the participants was 64.8±15.3 years, with 57.9% male and an ejection fraction of 67.0±6.8%. The electrocardiogram was normal for 32.3%, 18.6% had right bundle branch block (RBBB), 17.7% had left anterior fascicular block (LAFB), 15.6% had RBBB+LAFB, and 15.9% had LBBB. The echocardiogram showed an increased left ventricular pre-ejection by 18.7% (p<0.001) and 56.8% (p<0.001) in RBBB+LAFB and LBBB, respectively. There was a post-systolic myocardial contraction in all types of IVB and ventricular dyssynchrony in LBBB. Using the vectorcardiogram, initial activation of the R wave was increased by 17.4% in LAFB (p<0.001), 43.5% in RBBB+LAFB (p<0.001) and 47.4% in LBBB (p<0.001) and delayed final activation by 69.4% in LBBB (p<0.001), 73.6% in RBBB+LAFB (p<0.001) and 95.3% in RBBB (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: All IVBs modified the CC; however, only LBBB and RBBB+LAFB significantly changed the left ventricular cycle, thereby evidencing the greater complexity of these disorders.
OBJECTIVES: To study the phases of the cardiac cycle (CC) and ventricular synchrony in different ventricular activation patterns.
METHODS: Cross-sectional study with 328 consecutive individuals without structural heart disease, normal electrocardiogram or IVB, conducted in the period between August/2020 and January/2022. Echocardiogram and Vectorcardiogram were performed simultaneously to analyze the electromechanics of the CC. A one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni's multiple comparison test was used, with a significance level of 5%.
RESULTS: The age of the participants was 64.8±15.3 years, with 57.9% male and an ejection fraction of 67.0±6.8%. The electrocardiogram was normal for 32.3%, 18.6% had right bundle branch block (RBBB), 17.7% had left anterior fascicular block (LAFB), 15.6% had RBBB+LAFB, and 15.9% had LBBB. The echocardiogram showed an increased left ventricular pre-ejection by 18.7% (p<0.001) and 56.8% (p<0.001) in RBBB+LAFB and LBBB, respectively. There was a post-systolic myocardial contraction in all types of IVB and ventricular dyssynchrony in LBBB. Using the vectorcardiogram, initial activation of the R wave was increased by 17.4% in LAFB (p<0.001), 43.5% in RBBB+LAFB (p<0.001) and 47.4% in LBBB (p<0.001) and delayed final activation by 69.4% in LBBB (p<0.001), 73.6% in RBBB+LAFB (p<0.001) and 95.3% in RBBB (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: All IVBs modified the CC; however, only LBBB and RBBB+LAFB significantly changed the left ventricular cycle, thereby evidencing the greater complexity of these disorders.