CNS drugs · 2026
Memantine Augmentation in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lyndon Stanley, McNally Donald R
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) remains challenging to treat despite established treatments.
OBJECTIVE: Since glutamatergic dysregulation is implicated in OCD, we systematically reviewed and meta-analysed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing adjunctive memantine versus placebo for OCD.
METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and trial registries from inception to September 2025 for RCTs of adjunctive memantine in adults with OCD [PROSPERO: CRD420251147106]. The primary outcome was endpoint Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale score. Random-effects models used REML estimation with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman confidence intervals. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 and certainty of evidence with GRADE.
RESULTS: Six RCTs (n = 288; 8-16 weeks; 5-20 mg/day) met inclusion criteria. Overall, memantine did not produce a statistically significant symptom reduction versus placebo (pooled mean difference -3.74 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] -9.95 to 2.47), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 97.9%). Trials in treatment-resistant populations showed a larger but imprecise estimate (≈ -8.85 points), whereas non-resistant trials showed minimal added benefit (≈ -1.26 points); this subgroup observation was based on two RCTs, and meta-regression was underpowered and non-significant. Responder outcomes favored memantine but were statistically unstable (risk ratio [RR] 3.62, 95% CI 0.16-80.71). Tolerability outcomes did not identify clear excess adverse events, excess discontinuations for adverse events, or higher all-cause discontinuation (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.82-1.31).
CONCLUSIONS: Memantine is not supported for routine use in unselected OCD. In treatment-resistant OCD, current evidence supports a hypothesis-generating signal that may justify cautious off-label discussion when established augmenters are unsuitable. An adequately powered RCT in refractory OCD is warranted.
OBJECTIVE: Since glutamatergic dysregulation is implicated in OCD, we systematically reviewed and meta-analysed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing adjunctive memantine versus placebo for OCD.
METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and trial registries from inception to September 2025 for RCTs of adjunctive memantine in adults with OCD [PROSPERO: CRD420251147106]. The primary outcome was endpoint Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale score. Random-effects models used REML estimation with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman confidence intervals. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 and certainty of evidence with GRADE.
RESULTS: Six RCTs (n = 288; 8-16 weeks; 5-20 mg/day) met inclusion criteria. Overall, memantine did not produce a statistically significant symptom reduction versus placebo (pooled mean difference -3.74 points, 95% confidence interval [CI] -9.95 to 2.47), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 97.9%). Trials in treatment-resistant populations showed a larger but imprecise estimate (≈ -8.85 points), whereas non-resistant trials showed minimal added benefit (≈ -1.26 points); this subgroup observation was based on two RCTs, and meta-regression was underpowered and non-significant. Responder outcomes favored memantine but were statistically unstable (risk ratio [RR] 3.62, 95% CI 0.16-80.71). Tolerability outcomes did not identify clear excess adverse events, excess discontinuations for adverse events, or higher all-cause discontinuation (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.82-1.31).
CONCLUSIONS: Memantine is not supported for routine use in unselected OCD. In treatment-resistant OCD, current evidence supports a hypothesis-generating signal that may justify cautious off-label discussion when established augmenters are unsuitable. An adequately powered RCT in refractory OCD is warranted.