Head & neck · 2010
Ultrasound-guided mechanical fragmentation of sialoliths (sonoguide forceps).
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Geisthoff Urban W, Maune Steffen
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Little data about the efficacy and limitations of ultrasound-guided mechanical intraductal stone fragmentation and removal of sialoliths (Sonoguide Forceps) exist.
METHODS: This was a chart review of patients treated within the last 4 years at 2 tertiary care centers.
RESULTS: Sonoguide Forceps were used as a second-line treatment in 22 patients with sialolithiasis. Ten patients were free of stones and symptoms afterwards (7 of 17 submandibular, 2 of 4 parotid, 1 of 1 sublingual). Six patients were primarily treated for parotid sialolithiasis, 4 with successful stone retrieval. The reasons for failure were a lack of accessibility to the stone by the forceps (n = 9), the impossibility of grasping the stone (n = 5), and/or the concomitant grabbing of soft tissue together with the stone (n = 3).
CONCLUSION: The efficacy of Sonoguide Forceps as both a secondary and primary treatment modality makes it an interesting, simple, and inexpensive therapeutic alternative. Relevant parameters for treatment success include the size and position of the stones.
METHODS: This was a chart review of patients treated within the last 4 years at 2 tertiary care centers.
RESULTS: Sonoguide Forceps were used as a second-line treatment in 22 patients with sialolithiasis. Ten patients were free of stones and symptoms afterwards (7 of 17 submandibular, 2 of 4 parotid, 1 of 1 sublingual). Six patients were primarily treated for parotid sialolithiasis, 4 with successful stone retrieval. The reasons for failure were a lack of accessibility to the stone by the forceps (n = 9), the impossibility of grasping the stone (n = 5), and/or the concomitant grabbing of soft tissue together with the stone (n = 3).
CONCLUSION: The efficacy of Sonoguide Forceps as both a secondary and primary treatment modality makes it an interesting, simple, and inexpensive therapeutic alternative. Relevant parameters for treatment success include the size and position of the stones.