Frontiers in oncology · 2024
Significance of apparent diffusion coefficient in diagnosis of rectal carcinoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Šarošković Milica, Vuković Miloš, Stojanoski Stefan, Zorić Milica, Prvulović Bunović Nataša, Spirovski Milena, Nosek Igor
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is a quantitative parameter that facilitates the detection and reliable differentiation of rectal cancer. MR differentiation between rectal carcinoma, post-radiation proctitis, and normal rectal wall with the ADC values and their comparison depending on the level of tumor markers and pathohistological characteristics of rectal carcinoma.
METHODS: The retrospective study performed at the Oncology Institute of Vojvodina included 300 patients, 100 each with rectal cancer, post-radiation proctitis, and normal rectum. Mean ADC values were obtained by measuring the region of interest (ROI) of the rectal wall.
RESULTS: Rectal cancer showed lower ADC values (0.665 ± 0.086 x 10-3mm2/s) compared to both post-radiation proctitis (1.648 ± 0.268 x 10-3mm2/s) and normal rectum (1.180 ± 0.110 x 10-3mm2/s) (p<0.001). No significant differences in ADC values were observed between different grades of rectal cancer (p=0.874; p>0.05), depending on the presence of metastases in the lymph nodes (p=0.357; p>0.05), different TN stage (p=0.196; p>0.05), local spread of the tumor (p=0.312; p>0.05), the presence of RAS mutation (p=0.829; p>0.05) and the value of tumor markers (p=0.923; p>0.05). ADC values below 1.013 x 10-3mm2/s with 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity indicate the presence of rectal cancer in relation to normal wall, with a positive predictive value of 96.1% and a negative of 100%. ADC values below 1.255 x 10-3mm2/s with 100% sensitivity and 95% specificity indicate rectal cancer in relation to post-radiation proctitis. ADC values above 1.339 x 10-3mm2/s with 87% sensitivity and 89% specificity indicate post-radiation proctitis in relation to normal wall.
DISCUSSION: The ADC is a useful marker in differentiating between rectal cancer, post-radiation proctitis, and normal rectal wall with high sensitivity and specificity, but it cannot be used to distinguish the histological grades of rectal cancer, nor other pathohistological parameters.
METHODS: The retrospective study performed at the Oncology Institute of Vojvodina included 300 patients, 100 each with rectal cancer, post-radiation proctitis, and normal rectum. Mean ADC values were obtained by measuring the region of interest (ROI) of the rectal wall.
RESULTS: Rectal cancer showed lower ADC values (0.665 ± 0.086 x 10-3mm2/s) compared to both post-radiation proctitis (1.648 ± 0.268 x 10-3mm2/s) and normal rectum (1.180 ± 0.110 x 10-3mm2/s) (p<0.001). No significant differences in ADC values were observed between different grades of rectal cancer (p=0.874; p>0.05), depending on the presence of metastases in the lymph nodes (p=0.357; p>0.05), different TN stage (p=0.196; p>0.05), local spread of the tumor (p=0.312; p>0.05), the presence of RAS mutation (p=0.829; p>0.05) and the value of tumor markers (p=0.923; p>0.05). ADC values below 1.013 x 10-3mm2/s with 100% sensitivity and 96% specificity indicate the presence of rectal cancer in relation to normal wall, with a positive predictive value of 96.1% and a negative of 100%. ADC values below 1.255 x 10-3mm2/s with 100% sensitivity and 95% specificity indicate rectal cancer in relation to post-radiation proctitis. ADC values above 1.339 x 10-3mm2/s with 87% sensitivity and 89% specificity indicate post-radiation proctitis in relation to normal wall.
DISCUSSION: The ADC is a useful marker in differentiating between rectal cancer, post-radiation proctitis, and normal rectal wall with high sensitivity and specificity, but it cannot be used to distinguish the histological grades of rectal cancer, nor other pathohistological parameters.