The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
Three-Dimensional High-Resolution Mesh Analysis of Mixed-Dentition Intraoral Models for Predicting Future Orthognathic Surgery in Patients With Cleft Lip and/or Palate.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tanimura Towako, Tanikawa Chihiro, Yamashiro Takashi
Аннотация
ObjectiveTo evaluate the 3-dimensional (3D) geometric characteristics of mixed-dentition intraoral models and identify morphological features associated with later inclusion of orthognathic surgery (OGS), rather than camouflage treatment alone (non-OGS/NOGS), as a treatment option in patients with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P).DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingInstitutional study.ParticipantsA total of 320 patients with unilateral or bilateral CL/P who received first-phase orthodontic treatment at ages 5 to 7 years (T1) and continued treatment until age 15 (T2).Main Outcome MeasuresIntraoral models obtained at T1 were digitized with a 3D scanner. Dentition and palatal morphology were quantified using a high-resolution template-based geometric morphometric method based on dense corresponding surface vertices and summarized as principal components (PCs). Logistic regression models incorporating PCs and clinical variables (number of alveolar clefts, palatal repair method, sex, and number of missing teeth) were used to predict whether OGS was included as a treatment option at T2. Surface-based group differences were assessed using 2-sample t-tests (P < .05).ResultsSignificant morphological differences between OGS and NOGS groups were identified in both maxillary and mandibular dental arches at T1. Features associated with OGS inclusion were a narrow maxillary arch, a shallow palate, Class III dentoalveolar relationships, a steep occlusal plane, and lingual tooth displacement. The predictive model demonstrated good discriminative performance, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82.Conclusions3D mixed-dentition intraoral models at T1 captured dentition and palate features predictive of later consideration of OGS during treatment planning in patients with CL/P.