Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987) · 2015
Partial splenic embolization of patients with hypersplenism by transradial or transfemoral approach: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wu Tao, Sun Ruimin, Huang Yinuo, Wang Zhixue, He Jue, Shen Songhe, Yin Xiaoxiang, Zhu Zhixiang, Yang Wenyi, Zhao Zhijun
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Partial splenic artery embolization (PSE) is an effective treatment modality for patients with hypersplenism. It is less invasive and has a quicker recovery compared with surgical procedures. PSE is usually performed using a femoral artery approach that requires bedrest for a few hours, which is rarely the case for transradial PSE.
PURPOSE: To compare the transradial and transfemoral approaches for embolization of spleen in patients with hypersplenism.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In all, 84 patients with hypersplenism who required PSE were recruited. They were randomly divided into two groups on the basis of the procedure followed: the transradial approach (R-PSE, n = 39) or transfemoral approach (F-PSE, n = 45). Technical success, puncture rate, total procedure time, X-ray exposure time, length of stay in hospital (LOS), and complications of the two groups were recorded.
RESULTS: The procedure time, X-ray exposure time, and LOS were found to be lower in the R-PSE group than in the F-PSE. However, this difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: The transradial artery approach for PSE in patients with hypersplenism is feasible with no major complications as compared to the femoral approach.
PURPOSE: To compare the transradial and transfemoral approaches for embolization of spleen in patients with hypersplenism.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In all, 84 patients with hypersplenism who required PSE were recruited. They were randomly divided into two groups on the basis of the procedure followed: the transradial approach (R-PSE, n = 39) or transfemoral approach (F-PSE, n = 45). Technical success, puncture rate, total procedure time, X-ray exposure time, length of stay in hospital (LOS), and complications of the two groups were recorded.
RESULTS: The procedure time, X-ray exposure time, and LOS were found to be lower in the R-PSE group than in the F-PSE. However, this difference was not statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: The transradial artery approach for PSE in patients with hypersplenism is feasible with no major complications as compared to the femoral approach.