Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde · 2015
[Many possible causes of variant angina].
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Van de Bruaene Laurens, Argacha Jean-François, Kayaert Peter, Schoors Danny, Droogmans Steven
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Variant angina, or vasospastic angina, is a form of angina caused by vasospasm of the coronary arteries, probably caused by endothelial dysfunction. This form of angina is provoked by non-classical risk factors such as stress, alcohol use, use of sympathomimetics and low environmental temperatures, but also by smoking. Treatment is based on elimination of risk factors and vasodilator therapy with nitrates and long-acting calcium antagonists.
CASE DESCRIPTION: We present a 68-year-old woman with recurring thoracalgia at rest and during exercise, suggestive of severe variant angina in more than one coronary artery. Despite elimination of risk factors and administration of vasodilatory therapy the treatment was initially insufficient. It eventually emerged that the probable cause was frequent use of a vasoconstrictive nasal spray, although this was not described in literature, and not originally mentioned by the patient.
CONCLUSION: A thorough case history is of vital importance in a patient presenting with a history suggestive of variant angina. Even undescribed and apparently less important risk factors can be responsible for persistence of symptoms, and can lead to an applied treatment not producing the desired result.
CASE DESCRIPTION: We present a 68-year-old woman with recurring thoracalgia at rest and during exercise, suggestive of severe variant angina in more than one coronary artery. Despite elimination of risk factors and administration of vasodilatory therapy the treatment was initially insufficient. It eventually emerged that the probable cause was frequent use of a vasoconstrictive nasal spray, although this was not described in literature, and not originally mentioned by the patient.
CONCLUSION: A thorough case history is of vital importance in a patient presenting with a history suggestive of variant angina. Even undescribed and apparently less important risk factors can be responsible for persistence of symptoms, and can lead to an applied treatment not producing the desired result.