Journal of dermatological science · 2022
Clinicopathological digital image analyses before and after thermal stimulation subdivide acquired idiopathic generalized anhidrosis into inflammatory and non-inflammatory type.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shimoda-Komatsu Yurie, Yamazaki Yoshimi, Kimishima Momoko, Mizukawa Yoshiko, Ohyama Manabu
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Acquired idiopathic generalized anhidrosis (AIGA) manifests varying degrees of syringotropic inflammation.
OBJECTIVE: To better understand the basis of inflammation in AIGA.
METHODS: Changes in the extent of cell infiltration around the sweat gland/duct and the difference in the expression level of immune privilege (IP)-related/sweat gland markers before and after thermal stimulation were assessed in AIGA. We also adopted a semi-quantitative digital image analysis of sweating as detected by the starch-iodine method. The changes in sweating before and after treatment was defined as the improvement index.
RESULTS: Nine AIGA cases were analyzed. Two cases with minimal inflammation were defined as non-inflammatory type (non-inf)AIGA, while others with evident cell infiltration were defined as inflammatory type (inf)AIGA. MHC class I was significantly upregulated with downregulation of macrophage migration inhibitory factor and alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone exclusively in the sweat duct of infAIGA after thermal stimulation (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the extent of inflammation and the ductal dermcidin expression prior to thermal stimulation were inversely correlated (r = - 0.807), while that and the ductal claudin-1 expression after thermal stimulation was positively correlated (r = 0.875). The improvement index positively correlated with the degree of inflammation after thermal stimulation implying possible contribution of inflammation in AIGA pathophysiology. In addition, interferon-induced protein 10 and claudin-1 expression level in the sweat duct before thermal stimulation respectively correlated with the improvement index (r = 0.750, and 0.762).
CONCLUSION: The pathophysiology of AIGA may be subcategorized into two groups: IP-collapse possibly play some roles in infAIGA, while ductal dysfunction may exist in non-infAIGA.
OBJECTIVE: To better understand the basis of inflammation in AIGA.
METHODS: Changes in the extent of cell infiltration around the sweat gland/duct and the difference in the expression level of immune privilege (IP)-related/sweat gland markers before and after thermal stimulation were assessed in AIGA. We also adopted a semi-quantitative digital image analysis of sweating as detected by the starch-iodine method. The changes in sweating before and after treatment was defined as the improvement index.
RESULTS: Nine AIGA cases were analyzed. Two cases with minimal inflammation were defined as non-inflammatory type (non-inf)AIGA, while others with evident cell infiltration were defined as inflammatory type (inf)AIGA. MHC class I was significantly upregulated with downregulation of macrophage migration inhibitory factor and alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone exclusively in the sweat duct of infAIGA after thermal stimulation (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the extent of inflammation and the ductal dermcidin expression prior to thermal stimulation were inversely correlated (r = - 0.807), while that and the ductal claudin-1 expression after thermal stimulation was positively correlated (r = 0.875). The improvement index positively correlated with the degree of inflammation after thermal stimulation implying possible contribution of inflammation in AIGA pathophysiology. In addition, interferon-induced protein 10 and claudin-1 expression level in the sweat duct before thermal stimulation respectively correlated with the improvement index (r = 0.750, and 0.762).
CONCLUSION: The pathophysiology of AIGA may be subcategorized into two groups: IP-collapse possibly play some roles in infAIGA, while ductal dysfunction may exist in non-infAIGA.