MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/diagnostics15233035

Медицинская библиотека · Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025

Comparison of Bacteriology Between Geriatric and Adult Rhinosinusitis with and Without NPs.

Lin Meng-Chun, Chen Yi-Ching, Jiang Rong-San

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Background

In this study, we attempted to compare the bacteriology of chronic rhinosisusitis (CRS) with and without nasal polyps between geriatric and adult patients.

Methods

This retrospective cross-sectional study included 751 patients with CRS who underwent bilateral primary functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Before surgery, swab samples were collected from the middle meatus for bacterial cultures using cotton-tipped sticks. Subjects were divided into adult (20 to 64 years, n = 683) and elderly (65 years, n = 68) groups. The results of the bacteria culture were analyzed according to age group and the presence of nasal polyps.

Results

The bacterial culture rate was higher in geriatric patients (55.9%) than in adults (44.9%), but the difference was not statistically significant. However, geriatric patients showed a higher bacterial culture rate (57.6%) than adult patients (29.6%) without nasal polyps. This difference was statistically significant.

Conclusions

Geriatric patients with CRS exhibited higher bacterial culture rates, particularly on the non-polyp side. These findings suggest a possible age-related susceptibility to microbial colonization, underscoring the need for age-specific infection management strategies.

Для цитирования: Lin Meng-Chun, Chen Yi-Ching, Jiang Rong-San. Comparison of Bacteriology Between Geriatric and Adult Rhinosinusitis with and Without NPs.. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2025. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15233035.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.