MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1684/ejd.2022.4223

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of dermatology : EJD · 2022

Facial anatomical site-related variation in short-term outcomes of laser treatment for congenital melanocytic nevi.

Zou Yun, Yifei Zhao, Cen Qingqing, Gu Hao, Ma Gang, Sun Yi, Chen Hui, Lin Xiaoxi

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Laser treatment for congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) is controversial. Correlations between anatomical distribution of facial CMN and efficacy of laser treatment have not been characterized.

MATERIALS &

METHODS

A total of 90 facial CMN treated with ablative laser (Er:YAG or CO2 laser) were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical assessments were completed by at least two plastic surgeons using the Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score.

RESULTS

The mean IGA score was 4.37. The IGA scores recorded at the periorbital, temple/forehead, nose, cheek and lip/chin areas were 3.68, 5.88, 4.63, 4.52 and 4.92, respectively (p = 0.03). Moreover, facial CMN with uniform pigment distribution showed higher IGA scores than those with a non-uniform pigment distribution. Thickening, hairiness and age at first treatment were not statistically correlated with laser efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Correlations between anatomical distribution and the efficacy of laser treatment are described for the first time. The subdivided anatomical distribution of facial CMN can yield meaningful information on predicting the efficacy of laser treatment.

Для цитирования: Zou Yun, Yifei Zhao, Cen Qingqing, Gu Hao, Ma Gang, Sun Yi, Chen Hui, Lin Xiaoxi. Facial anatomical site-related variation in short-term outcomes of laser treatment for congenital melanocytic nevi.. European journal of dermatology : EJD. 2022. DOI: 10.1684/ejd.2022.4223.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.