American journal of ophthalmology · 2020
"Descemet Membrane Detachment": A Novel Concept in Diagnosis and Classification.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Dua Harminder S, Sinha Rajesh, D'Souza Sharon, Potgieter Frik, Ross Andrew, Kenawy Mohamed, Scott Ian, Said Dalia G
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To examine the optical coherence tomography (OCT) and histologic features of Descemet membrane detachment (DMD) to ascertain the involvement of the pre-Descemet layer (PDL).
DESIGN: Retrospective, observational case series.
METHODS: Clinical, histopathologic, and OCT features of a cohort of 41 cases with diagnosis of DMD from 4 centers were studied. OCT images were evaluated independently by 3 observers for number of detached layers (1 or 2), reflectivity, configuration (straight line or wavy), distance from posterior stroma, and presence or absence of a tear with any scrolling of the torn edges. Five had a histology specimen. The main outcome measure was the involvement of the PDL in DMD and its confirmation by histology.
RESULTS: Three types of DMD were identified: type 1, where the PDL and DM were detached together; type 2, where only the DM was detached; and mixed, where the PDL and DM were detached but also separated from each other. These were further found to be rhegmatogenous or nonrhegmatogenous depending on the presence of absence of a tear in DM or both layers. Histology confirmed involvement of PDL in all 5 cases and showed it to be infiltrated by cells in 3 of 5 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The PDL is involved in DMD. This fact significantly changes our understanding of DMD and could have implications for management. The detached PDL can be infiltrated with cells. A prospective study in relation to etiology and types of DMD is needed.
DESIGN: Retrospective, observational case series.
METHODS: Clinical, histopathologic, and OCT features of a cohort of 41 cases with diagnosis of DMD from 4 centers were studied. OCT images were evaluated independently by 3 observers for number of detached layers (1 or 2), reflectivity, configuration (straight line or wavy), distance from posterior stroma, and presence or absence of a tear with any scrolling of the torn edges. Five had a histology specimen. The main outcome measure was the involvement of the PDL in DMD and its confirmation by histology.
RESULTS: Three types of DMD were identified: type 1, where the PDL and DM were detached together; type 2, where only the DM was detached; and mixed, where the PDL and DM were detached but also separated from each other. These were further found to be rhegmatogenous or nonrhegmatogenous depending on the presence of absence of a tear in DM or both layers. Histology confirmed involvement of PDL in all 5 cases and showed it to be infiltrated by cells in 3 of 5 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: The PDL is involved in DMD. This fact significantly changes our understanding of DMD and could have implications for management. The detached PDL can be infiltrated with cells. A prospective study in relation to etiology and types of DMD is needed.