International journal of colorectal disease · 2020
Treatment of chronic anal fissure: a feasibility study on Levorag® Emulgel versus Diltiazem gel 2.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеEquivalence TrialНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nordholm-Carstensen Andreas, Perregaard Helene, Wahlstrøm Kirsten Lykke, Hagen Kikke Bartholin, Hougaard Helene Tarri, Krarup Peter-Martin
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To compare the standard treatment, diltiazem gel 2%, with Levorag® Emulgel for chronic anal fissures.
METHODS: This was a single-blinded, randomised, controlled, clinical trial with a non-inferiority design. Patients with a chronic anal fissure were randomised to treatment with diltiazem or Levorag® Emulgel twice daily for 8 weeks. Primary endpoint was complete healing of the anal fissure after 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included incidence of adverse events and efficacy on pain relief.
RESULTS: In total, 55 patients were included. Inclusion was terminated prematurely due to a slow inclusion rate. Complete fissure healing at 12 weeks follow-up was overall achieved in 31 of 55 (56%) patients, 18 of 29 (62%) in the diltiazem group compared with 13 of 26 (50%) in the Levorag® Emulgel group (P = 0.424). Pain relief was significantly better at day seven in patients treated with diltiazem (P = 0.040) compared with Levorag® Emulgel, whereas there were no differences in early (3 days) or late (12 weeks) pain relief. Three patients (10.3%) developed severe perianal exanthema during diltiazem treatment, whereas no side effects were observed in the Levorag® Emulgel group.
CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated statistical non-inferiority of Levorag® Emulgel compared with diltiazem in the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Diltiazem resulted in a more prompt pain relief and also in a substantial number of local allergic reactions. Levorag® Emulgel may therefore be an alternative in these patients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov no. NCT02158013.
METHODS: This was a single-blinded, randomised, controlled, clinical trial with a non-inferiority design. Patients with a chronic anal fissure were randomised to treatment with diltiazem or Levorag® Emulgel twice daily for 8 weeks. Primary endpoint was complete healing of the anal fissure after 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included incidence of adverse events and efficacy on pain relief.
RESULTS: In total, 55 patients were included. Inclusion was terminated prematurely due to a slow inclusion rate. Complete fissure healing at 12 weeks follow-up was overall achieved in 31 of 55 (56%) patients, 18 of 29 (62%) in the diltiazem group compared with 13 of 26 (50%) in the Levorag® Emulgel group (P = 0.424). Pain relief was significantly better at day seven in patients treated with diltiazem (P = 0.040) compared with Levorag® Emulgel, whereas there were no differences in early (3 days) or late (12 weeks) pain relief. Three patients (10.3%) developed severe perianal exanthema during diltiazem treatment, whereas no side effects were observed in the Levorag® Emulgel group.
CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated statistical non-inferiority of Levorag® Emulgel compared with diltiazem in the treatment of chronic anal fissure. Diltiazem resulted in a more prompt pain relief and also in a substantial number of local allergic reactions. Levorag® Emulgel may therefore be an alternative in these patients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov no. NCT02158013.