Retinal cases & brief reports · 2022
ANTERIOR MIGRATION OF INTRAVITREAL FLUOCINOLONE ACETONIDE IMPLANTS: A CASE REPORT.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gunzenhauser Robert C, Greven Margaret A, John Vishak J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To describe management of anterior migration of a fluocinolone acetonide(FAc) intravitreal implant.
METHODS: A retrospective case report. A 61-year-old man with diabetic macular edema and prior vitrectomy had anterior migration of a FAc implant. Anterior segment photos and optical coherence tomography were performed.
RESULTS: Approximately 3 months after FAc implant was administered, it was noted to have migrated into the anterior chamber. Vision, intraocular pressure, and optical coherence tomography imaging initially remained stable, and no evidence of detectable corneal edema developed in 30 months of follow-up. However, at 36 months of follow-up, after second FAc implant injection, mild corneal edema developed,suspected to be related to the migrating implants.
CONCLUSION: Anterior migration of a FAc implant may lead to less rapid and severe corneal decompensation compared with other steroid implants. Despite this, delayed corneal edema may occur. Careful monitoring of the cornea and intraocular pressure is recommended in cases of anterior FAc migration.
METHODS: A retrospective case report. A 61-year-old man with diabetic macular edema and prior vitrectomy had anterior migration of a FAc implant. Anterior segment photos and optical coherence tomography were performed.
RESULTS: Approximately 3 months after FAc implant was administered, it was noted to have migrated into the anterior chamber. Vision, intraocular pressure, and optical coherence tomography imaging initially remained stable, and no evidence of detectable corneal edema developed in 30 months of follow-up. However, at 36 months of follow-up, after second FAc implant injection, mild corneal edema developed,suspected to be related to the migrating implants.
CONCLUSION: Anterior migration of a FAc implant may lead to less rapid and severe corneal decompensation compared with other steroid implants. Despite this, delayed corneal edema may occur. Careful monitoring of the cornea and intraocular pressure is recommended in cases of anterior FAc migration.