Nihon Ronen Igakkai zasshi. Japanese journal of geriatrics · 2013
[Effects of nutrition intervention for pressure ulcer patients--healing rate and speed of wound size and nutrition--].
Аннотация на английскомСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ohura Takehiko, Nakajo Toshio, Okada Shingo, Omura Kenji, Adachi Kayoko, Oishi Shohei
Аннотация
UNLABELLED: The objective of this multicenter open-label randomized study was for evaluating nutrition intervention on pressure ulcer healing. Tube-fed patients with Stages III to IV pressure ulcers were enrolled. Target energy levels to be given were the same value as at the time of enrollment or BEE×1.1 (activity factor)×1.1-1.3 (stress factor) in the control group, and BEE×1.1×1.3-1.5 in the intervention group. Both groups received the feeding formula Racol(®) for 12 weeks, and were prescribed to have pressure relief mattresses, and to unify the repositioning method, treatment drugs, and wound dressing materials. Ulcer sizes (length×width), nutritional state, and adverse events were evaluated.
RESULTS OF THE STUDY: Energy levels administered to the control (n=29) and intervention (n=21) groups were 29.1±4.9 (mean±SD) and 37.9±6.5 kcal/kg/day, respectively. Regarding pressure ulcer size, the interaction between the nutrition intervention and the courses during observational weeks was significant (P<0.001). Similarly, significant differences were observed with weight, waist circumference, Cu (P<0.001), suprailiac skinfold thickness (P<0.01), thigh circumference, and prealbumin (P<0.05), but not with the incidence of adverse events (P=0.360). Principal component analysis indicated remarkable decreases in ulcer size and improvement rates of waist circumference and suprailiac skinfold thickness in the intervention group. Covariance structure analysis showed that nutrition intervention has a direct effect on reduction in ulcer size. The results suggested that aggressive nutrient intervention accelerated the pressure ulcer of wound healing process and had a direct effect on reduction in ulcer size.
RESULTS OF THE STUDY: Energy levels administered to the control (n=29) and intervention (n=21) groups were 29.1±4.9 (mean±SD) and 37.9±6.5 kcal/kg/day, respectively. Regarding pressure ulcer size, the interaction between the nutrition intervention and the courses during observational weeks was significant (P<0.001). Similarly, significant differences were observed with weight, waist circumference, Cu (P<0.001), suprailiac skinfold thickness (P<0.01), thigh circumference, and prealbumin (P<0.05), but not with the incidence of adverse events (P=0.360). Principal component analysis indicated remarkable decreases in ulcer size and improvement rates of waist circumference and suprailiac skinfold thickness in the intervention group. Covariance structure analysis showed that nutrition intervention has a direct effect on reduction in ulcer size. The results suggested that aggressive nutrient intervention accelerated the pressure ulcer of wound healing process and had a direct effect on reduction in ulcer size.