MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/ceo.14065

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2022

Electronegative electroretinogram in the modern multimodal imaging era.

Sakti Dhimas H, Ali Haipha, Korsakova Maria, Saakova Nonna, Mustafic Nina, Fraser Clare L, Jamieson Robyn V, Cornish Elisa E, Grigg John R

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The electronegative electroretinogram (ERG) reflecting inner retinal dysfunction can assist as a diagnostic tool to determine the anatomical location in eye disease. The aim of this study is to determine the frequency and aetiology of electronegative ERG in a tertiary ophthalmology centre and to develop a clinical algorithm to assist patient management.

METHODS

Retrospective review of ERGs performed at the Save Sight Institute from January 2011 to December 2020. ERGs were performed according to ISCEV standard. The b:a ratio was analysed in dark adapted (DA) 3.0 or 12.0 recordings. Patients with ratio of ≤1.0 were included.

RESULTS

A total of 4421 patients had ERGs performed during study period, of which 139 patients (3.1%) had electronegative ERG. The electronegative ERG patients' median age at referral time was 37 (0.7-90.6) years. The causative aetiologies were photoreceptor dystrophy (48, 34.5%), Congenital Stationary Night Blindness (CSNB) (33, 23.7%), retinal ischemia (18, 12.9%), retinoschisis (15, 10.8%), paraneoplastic autoimmune retinopathy (PAIR) and nonPAIR (14, 10.1%), batten disease (4, 2.9%), and inflammatory retinopathy (4, 2.9%). There were three patients with an unclassified diagnosis. Thirty-two patients (23%) had good vision and a normal fundus appearance. Eleven patients (7.9%) had good vision and normal results in all multimodal imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

The frequency of electronegative ERG in our referral centre was 3.1% with photoreceptor dystrophy as the main aetiology. A significant number of the cases had good vision with normal fundus or normal multimodal imaging. This further highlights the value of an ERG in this modern multimodal imaging era.

Для цитирования: Sakti Dhimas H, Ali Haipha, Korsakova Maria, Saakova Nonna, Mustafic Nina, Fraser Clare L, Jamieson Robyn V, Cornish Elisa E, Grigg John R. Electronegative electroretinogram in the modern multimodal imaging era.. Clinical & experimental ophthalmology. 2022. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.14065.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.