The British journal of dermatology · 1985
A comparative double blind study of ketoconazole and griseofulvin in dermatophytosis.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hay R J, Clayton Y M, Griffiths W A, Dowd P M
Аннотация
The merits of oral ketoconazole and griseofulvin in dermatophytosis have been compared in a double blind study on 74 patients with 152 infected sites. The initial daily doses were 200 mg and 500 mg respectively, but these were doubled after 3 months if there was an inadequate clinical response. Treatment was continued either until clinical and mycological remission was achieved or a year of therapy had been given. Seventy-five per cent (total 80) and 74% (total 72) of all infected sites treated with ketoconazole and griseofulvin respectively were cleared of infection. However, in toe nail infections the respective cure rates were only 21% and 17%. Ketoconazole appeared to act more rapidly in curing tinea corporis or tinea cruris due to Trichophyton rubrum, whereas griseofulvin was superior in T. interdigitale infections. No serious side-effects were encountered in either treatment group. In view of the slight risk of drug-induced hepatitis, ketoconazole is best reserved as a second-line drug for toe nail infections unless there are specific indications, such as griseofulvin intolerance. In these cases liver function tests should be monitored regularly throughout therapy.